Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;36(8):827–839. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00705-5

Table 3.

Associations between ever OC use, duration of OC use, and time since last OC use and endometrial cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study II (1989–2017)

Person-years Cases Adjusted for age and calendar period Multivariable-adjusteda
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Use of OCs
Never use 344,113 175 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
Ever use 1,957,361 689 0.67 (0.56–0.79) 0.77 (0.65–0.91)
  Current use 181,298 18 0.53 (0.32–0.87) 0.60 (0.36–0.99)
  Past use 1,762,550 663 0.67 (0.57–0.79) 0.77 (0.65–0.92)
Duration of OC use
Never use 344,113 175 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
 ≤ 1 year 334,666 154 0.82 (0.66–1.02) 0.97 (0.77–1.20)
 > 1–5 years 783,484 327 0.78 (0.64–0.93) 0.91 (0.75–1.09)
 > 5–10 years 529,236 145 0.55 (0.44–0.68) 0.63 (0.50–0.79)
 > 10 years 309,975 63 0.39 (0.29–0.52) 0.43 (0.32–0.58)
Continuous duration of use, in yearsb 0.94 (0.92–0.95) 0.94 (0.92–0.96)
 p-trendc < 0.0001 < 0.0001
 p-trendb < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Duration of OC use and time since last OC used
Never use 344,113 175 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
 ≤ 1 year of use 334,666 154 0.82 (0.66–1.02) 0.96 (0.77–1.20)
 > 1–5 years of use and ≤ 10 years since last use 197,255 40 0.76 (0.53–1.08) 0.89 (0.63–1.27)
 > 1–5 years of use and > 10 years since last use 534,797 278 0.79 (0.65–0.95) 0.91 (0.75–1.11)
 > 5 years of use and ≤ 10 years since last use 324,053 43 0.37 (0.26–0.52) 0.43 (0.31–0.60)
 > 5 years of use and > 10 years since last use 344,061 146 0.55 (0.44–0.69) 0.62 (0.50–0.78)

aAdjusted for age (months), calendar period, BMI (kg/m2, continuous), number of full-term pregnancies (continuous), smoking status (never/past/current), menopausal status (premenopausal/postmenopausal/perimenopausal or unknown), use of HT (never/ever), diagnosis of PCOS (yes/no), laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis (yes/no), age of menarche (years), and use of IUD/diaphragm (yes/no)

bCalculation including ever OC users only

cCalculation including never OC users

dCurrent OC users were excluded from this analysis