Table 6.

KAP score clusters to describe socioeconomic status of dog owners regarding rabies control in Thailand.

Factors	Cluster percent count percent
	1	2	3	Significancea
Number of cases in the cluster	99	105	272
Group describe	Positive attitudes but poor knowledge	Negative attitudes but good knowledge	Positive attitudes and good knowledge
Total practice score	4.46	4.42	4.46	0.964ns
Total attitude score	47.90	37.11	42.51	0.000**
Total knowledge score	7.67	8.35	8.33	0.001**
Risk area	High 50.5%	High 54.3%	High 50.0%	0.751ns
	Low 49.5%	Low 45.7%	Low 50.0%
Region	South 28.3%	South 32.4%	NE 29.0%	0.055ns
	NE 26.3%	East 30.5%	South 26.5%
	North 26.3%	North 23.8%	North 23.2%
	East 19.2%	NE 13.3%	East 21.3%
Average age (year)	58.05	50.21	52.16	0.000**
Gender	Female 73.7%	Female 55.2%	Female 72.4%	0.003**
	Male 26.3%	Male 44.8%	Male 27.6%
Education	Primary 62.6%	Primary 41.0%	Primary 46.3%	0.038*
	Middle to high 17.2%	Middle to high 33.3%	Middle to high 21.7%
	Bachelor to higher 8.1%	Bachelor to higher 12.4%	Bachelor to higher 13.6%
Occupation	Farmer 45.5%	Farmer 32.4%	Farmer 43.8%	0.008**
	Housewife 22.2%	Housewife 21.0%	Housewife 16.2%
	Merchant 16.2%	Merchant 16.2%	Merchant 17.6%
Income	Below 10,000 = 50.5%	Below 10,000 = 38.1%	Below 10,000 = 56.6%	0.006**
	10,000–20,000 = 30.3%	10,000–20,000 = 26.7%	10,000–20,000 = 22.4%
	20,000–30,000 = 10.1%	20,000–30,000 = 16.2%	20,000–30,000 = 6.6%
	Over 30,000 = 9.1%	Over 30,000 = 19.0%	Over 30,000 = 14.3%
Number of dogs raised	2.32	3.73	2.2	0.002**
The average age of the youngest family member	26.42	21.65	19.10	0.009**
The average age of the oldest family member	62.78	57.94	61.66	0.039*
Rabies vaccine price that willing to pay	76.64	73.71	74.08	0.927ns

^a Statistically significant differences across groups were tested using Pearson's χ² test (

^*indicates statistically significant relationships for p < 0.05,

^** for p < 0.01 and

^nsstands for non-significant relationships).