Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;69:102012. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102012

Table 5.

DiD results. Turnout.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Treatment effect −3.182∗∗∗
(1.083)
−2.351∗∗
(1.044)
−3.227∗∗∗
(1.060)
−2.512∗∗
(1.229)
−2.759∗∗
(1.213)
−2.918∗∗
(1.381)
Covariates No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Weights No No Yes No Yes Yes
Municipality-specific linear trends
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Municipalities 232 232 232 232 232 232
Observations 1,390 1,389 1,389 1,390 1,389 1,389

Notes: ∗∗∗, ∗∗ and ∗ indicate 1%, 5% and 10% significance levels respectively. Robust standard errors clustered at the municipal level are presented in parentheses. Municipality, region and year fixed effects are included in all specifications.