Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;26(9):e1633–e1643. doi: 10.1002/onco.13845

Table 2.

Treatment characteristics of patients initiating 1L treatment

Treatment characteristic Overall (n = 94) Avelumab (n = 28) Non‐avelumab IO (n = 26) Chemotherapya (n = 40)
Time from laMCC/mMCC diagnosis to 1L treatment initiation, median (range), weeks 7.7 (0.0–165.4) 6.0 (0.1–161.7) 15.3 (0.0–165.4) 5.9 (0.3–164.0)
Patients with surgical resections prior to 1L treatment, n (%) 20 (21.3) 6 (21.4) 4 (15.4) 10 (25.0)
Patients with radiation treatments prior to 1L treatment, n (%) 11 (11.7) 2 (7.1) 5 (19.2) 4 (10.0)
Patients with 1L concurrentb surgical resections, n (%) 7 (7.4) 3 (10.7) 1 (3.8) 3(7.5)
Patients with 1L concurrentb radiation treatments, n (%) 23 (24.5) 6 (21.4) 6 (23.1) 11 (27.5)
Patients who discontinued treatment, n (%)c 78 (83.0) 18 (64.3) 21(80.8) 39 (97.5)
Reasons for treatment discontinuation, n (%)d
Disease progression 20 (25.6) 6 (33.3) 6 (28.6) 8 (20.5)
Toxicity 14 (17.9) 2 (11.1) 7 (33.3) 5 (12.8)
Death 11 (14.1) 3 (16.7) 4 (19.0) 5 (12.8)
Physician preference 9 (11.5) 5 (27.8) 1 (4.8) 2 (5.1)
Patient choice 2 (2.6) 0 1 (4.8) 1 (2.6)
Decline in performance status 1 (1.3) 0 1 (4.8) 0
Completed treatmente 20 (25.6) 1 (5.6) 1 (4.8) 18 (46.2)
Not documented 3 (3.8) 2 (11.1) 1 (4.8) 1 (2.6)
TTD, median (95% CI), months 3.8 (3.0–5.6) 10.5 (5.3–14.3) 7.3 (2.5–18.2) 2.2 (1.9–3.5)
a

Most common 1L treatments among chemotherapy patients were carboplatin + etoposide (n = 22) and cisplatin + etoposide (n = 10).

b

Concurrent treatment occurs during 1L therapy (between start and end dates).

c

Discontinuation before the end of the follow‐up period.

d

Patients could have multiple reasons for treatment discontinuation.

e

Physician notes were used to find out if the patient completed treatment.

Abbreviations: 1L, first‐line; CI, confidence interval; IO, immunotherapy; laMCC, locally advanced MCC; mMCC, metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma; TTD, time to discontinuation.