Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 18;8:722032. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.722032

Table 2.

Characteristic of included studies for assessing the Vitamin D Deficiency prevalence.

References Country Study design Latitude HIV age (year) Control age (year) Male percentage BMI No. of HIV group No. of control group No. of VDD in HIV group No. of VDD in control group P-value
Ross
et al. (29)
USA Cross-sectional study 41°30′N 49 38 80.9 26.19 149 34 69 10 0.076
Adeyemi
et al. (18)
USA Cross-sectional study multicenter 44 41 0 28.57 1,268 510 758 366 <0.001
Ceballos
et al. (37)
Chile Cross-sectional study 33°26′S 31.2 33.3 100 24.44 70 21 46 10 0.139
Currò
et al. (35)
Italy Case-control study 38°13′N 43.2 41.5 59.8 NA 57 40 25 6 0.004
Hidron
et al. (32)
USA Cross-sectional study 33°46′N 50 63 88.5 26 933 5,355 495 2,062 <0.001
Hileman
et al. (31)
USA Cohort study 41°30′N 40 37 69.3 26.65 47 41 33 32 0.405
Janbakhsh
et al. (28)
Iran Case-control study 34°19′N 40.11 45.59 87.2 NA 98 98 44 35 0.191
Klassen
et al. (38)
Australia Cross-sectional study 37°49′S 41 50 56 NA 997 3,653 398 805 <0.001
Mikula
et al. (39)
Poland Cross-sectional study 52°15′N 44.9 56.6 73.9 NA 148 40 36 7 0.364
Flauzino
et al. (40)
Brazil Cross-sectional study 23°30′S 40 40 53.5 25.17 314 127 178 75 0.649
Paul
et al. (41)
India Cross-sectional study 12°55′N 38.45 38.6 100 23.13 70 35 39 13 0.075

NA, not available; N, north; S, south; P-value: for evaluating the difference in VD deficiency prevalence between HIV and control groups; No: number.