Table 3.
References | Study type | Selection | Comparability | Exposure/Outcome | Final score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 | Item 4 | Item 5 | Item 6 | Item 7 | Item 8 | |||
Curro et al. (35) |
Case-control study | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Atteritano et al. (34) |
Case-control study | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Janbakhsh et al. (28) |
Case-control study | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Zhang et al. (33) |
Cohort study | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
Zhang et al. (36) |
Cohort study | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Hileman et al. (31) |
Cohort study | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
For case-control study; Item 1 Is the case definition adequate? Item 2 Representativeness of the cases; Item 3 Selection of Controls; Item 4 Definition of Controls; Item 5 Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis; Item 6 Ascertainment of exposure; Item 7 Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls; Item 8 Non-Response rate.
For cohort study; Item 1 Representativeness of the exposed cohort; Item 2 Selection of the non-exposed cohort; Item 3 Ascertainment of exposure; Item 4 Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study; Item 5 Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis; Item 6 Assessment of outcome; Item 7 Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur; Item 8 Adequacy of follow up of cohorts.