Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 31;35(9):e23934. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23934

TABLE 3.

Subgroup analysis of diagnostic accuracy of circRNAs in breast cancer

Subgroups CircRNAs Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PLR (95%CI) NLR (95%CI) DOR (95%CI) AUC (95%CI) Heterogeneity I 2 test (%)/P het Meta‐regression P‐value
Specimen
Tissue 17 0.73 (0.67–0.79) 0.73 (0.65–0.81) 2.8 (1.9–4.0) 0.36 (0.27–0.49) 8 (4–14) 0.80 (0.76–0.83) 84.9%/<0.01 0.620
Plasma 4 0.88 (0.72–0.95) 0.60 (0.49–0.71) 2.2 (1.7–2.9) 0.20 (0.08–0.49) 11 (4–31) 0.67 (0.63–0.71) 76.5%/<0.01
Case size
≥100 5 0.88 (0.73–0.95) 0.85 (0.67–0.94) 5.7 (2.5–13.0) 0.15 (0.06–0.33) 39 (11–136) 0.93 (0.90–0.95) 92.9%/<0.01 0.001
<100 16 0.71 (0.65–0.75) 0.66 (0.59–0.72) 2.1 (1.7–2.5) 0.45 (0.37–0.55) 5 (3–7) 0.74 (0.70–0.78) 59.2%/<0.01
Altered expression
Up‐regulated 9 0.77 (0.64–0.87) 0.68 (0.62–0.74) 2.4 (2.1–2.8) 0.33 (0.21–0.52) 7 (4–12) 0.74 (0.70–0.78) 75.0%/<0.01 0.817
Down‐regulated down‐regulated 12 0.76 (0.67–0.83) 0.74 (0.61–0.83) 2.9 (1.8–4.8) 0.33 (0.21–0.50) 9 (4–22) 0.81 (0.78–0.85) 89.1%/<0.01
Overall 21 0.77 (0.70–0.83) 0.71 (0.63–0.78) 2.6 (2, 0–3.5) 0.33 (0.24–0.45) 8 (5–14) 0.80 (0.77–0.84) 85.1%/<0.01