Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2020 Jan 10;429:92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.009

Table 2.

Freezing during conditioned fear (upper panel) and mean extinction freezing (lower panel) was correlated with delta FosB cell counts in forebrain regions. Note positive correlation of freezing with amygdala subdivisions and negative correlations with infralimbic (IL) cortex and hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG)

Fos-BLA Fos-CeA Fos-DG Fos-IL Fos-PL Fos-BNST Fos-NAc
Freezing (Conditioned Fear)
Number of XY Pairs 23 23 23 23 20 22 22
Pearson/Spearman r 0.4003 0.5451 −0.4191 −0.3533 0.2492 −0.03004 −0.3033
95% confidence interval −0.02732 to 0.7041 0.1587–0.7867 −0.7153 to 0.004759 −0.6754 to 0.08188 −0.2174 to 0.6231 −0.4461 to 0.3967 −0.6428 to 0.1358
P value (two-tailed) 0.0584 0.0071 0.0465 0.0981 0.2893 0.8944 0.1701
P value summary # * * # ns ns ns
Pearson (normal) or Spearman (Gaussian Approx) Spearman Spearman Spearman Spearman Pearson Pearson Pearson
Freezing (Extinction Mean)
Number of XY Pairs 23 23 23 23 20 22 22
Pearson/Spearman r 0.06621 0.3221 −0.4733 −0.5237 0.2317 −0.135 −0.248
95% confidence interval −0.3671 to 0.4759 −0.1168 to 0.6558 −0.7468 to −0.06293 −0.7750 to −0.1294 −0.2483 to 0.6203 −0.5362 to 0.3160 −0.6146 to 0.2068
P value (two-tailed) 0.7641 0.1339 0.0225 0.0103 0.3257 0.5492 0.2659
P value summary ns ns * * ns ns ns
Pearson (normal) or Spearman (Gaussian Approx) Spearman Spearman Spearman Spearman Pearson Pearson Pearson
*

p < 0.05,

#

p = 0.058 (BLA), p = 0.098 (IL).