Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2021 Apr-Jun;16(2):318–326. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i2.6283

Prevalence, Intensity and Risks Involved in Helminth Infections in Domestic Mountain Pony and Balkan Donkey in Nature Park Stara Planina, Serbia

Slavica Živković 1,*, Ivan Pavlović 2, Bojana Mijatović 1, Ivana Trailović 3, Dragiša Trailović 3
PMCID: PMC8418645  PMID: 34557248

Abstract

Background:

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, intensity and risk factors (age and gender) promoting the intestinal helminthic infections of the Domestic mountain ponies and Balkan donkeys in Serbia.

Methods:

Prevalence, intensity and risk factors influencing helminth infection in horses (n=39) and donkeys (n=18) at the site of Nature Park Stara Planina, were studied from May to Sep 2015. The presence of one or several gastrointestinal helminth species was confirmed by faecal flotation in 97.43% of horses and 88.88% of donkeys included in the monitoring. The identified helminth species were Trichostrongylus axei, Strongylus edentatus, S. vulgaris, Parascaris equorum, Dictyocaulus arnfieldi and Anoplocephala magna in 84.61%, 46.15%, 5.13%, 58.97%, 94.87% and 38.46% of horses, respectively. The significant association of infection with P. equorum and sex of horses was established. (χ2=13.33, P<0.01).

Results:

The prevalence of parasitic helminths identified in donkeys was the following: D. arnfieldi, T. axei, Pa. equorum, S. vulgaris, A. margna and Strongyloides westeri in 55.55%, 38.89%, 27.78%, 22.22% and 22.22% of donkeys, respectively. Moreover, the mean faecal egg count was higher in donkeys (369.9 EPG - egg per gram) than in horses (250.2 EPG). The association between the age and the mean EPG was significant (P<0.05) in both equine species.

Conclusion:

The results of the investigation provided basic information that can be helpful for planning strategic control of nematode infection in equine population in Nature Reserves in Serbia.

Keywords: Equine, Helminths, Infection, Prevalence, Stara Planina

Introduction

In recent decades, the populations of autochthonous livestock species and breeds have been rapidly decreasing. The devastating depopulation trend was very prominent in case of autochthonous equine and ruminant breeds so that these animals became endangered. During the last decades, the national program for Animal Genetic Resources (AnGR) protection and/or conservation included in-situ conservation of representative population samples of autochthonous equine and ruminant breeds. The animals included in the AnGR strategic conservation program are bred in a traditional free-range pasture system in the areas of protected nature, i.e. Nature Reserves and Parks. Domestic mountain pony is autochthonous horse breed of the Western Balkan. The breed descended from Tarpan (Equus ferus) and Przewalskii (Equus przewalskii) and that the original breed has developed through crossbreeding with Arab and other oriental horses. Mountain ponies of the former Yugoslavia, with exception of Bosnian pony, regardless of the geographic habitat and phenotypic differences were included into domestic mountain pony population, so that contemporary animals vary greatly both in morphology and in coat color.

Nowadays, domestic mountain pony in Serbia is bred at conservatory sites of Stara Planina, Stolovi, Prokletije, Shar Planina, Sjenica-Peshter (Reserve of Biosphere) and in Nature Reserves Zasavica and Kovilj. Trailović (1), Đermanović et al (2), Trailović et al (3,4) and Mitrović et al (5) previously described morphological, physiological and reproductive characteristics of this breed. As the other horse breeds developed on the Balkan, domestic mountain pony is sturdy, with characteristic good health, controlled and balanced temper, they are obedient and modest in demands. The breed adaptive characteristics are good; they easily endure the extreme climate and are highly resistant to various pathogens and to some extent to parasitic infections. The estimated current population size is around 500 to 550 horses but active population is much smaller.

The Balkan donkey (Equus asinus), also included on AnGR conservation programme, is an indigenous breed with the traditional breeding area in the mountain region of Serbia and other Balkan countries (1). These animals are kept is carried in the traditional breeding area of several protected nature reserves: Special Nature Reserve Zasavica, National Park Stara Planina and in the village of Kovilj, near Novi Sad. Due to microevolutive adaptation to the habitat extending from the mountains of Central Balkan with characteristic harsh climate to the Mediterranean area of the Balkan Peninsula, Balkan donkey is sturdy, with modest demands in nutrition and care. Estimated population size is only 200–250 animals, and with only half of the population, reproducing the urgent conservation programme for this breed was implemented during the last couple of years. Morphological, physiological and reproductive characteristics of this breed was previously described (3, 4, 6, 7).

Grazing on pasture facilitates almost constant ingestion of eggs and/or developing infective larvae and intermediate hosts of the parasites, while the lack of prevention favors the expansion of the parasites (8). Therefore, faecal excretion allows the permanent contamination of the pasture where horses and donkeys graze and enables permanent parasitic infection of the resident animals (9). The permanently parasites infections continue to be а significant factor for the health of equines (10). In the host, parasites cause loss of nutrients and blood provoking serious health problems in horses and donkeys worldwide (1116).

In Serbia, parasitological studies of domestic equines were sporadically performed (9,1719) therefore, valid historical data concerning the prevalence of helminthes in equines are lacking. The lack of systematic data on parasitic load is even more apparent when domestic mountain ponies and Balkan donkeys are concerned. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence, intensity and risk factors (age and gender) promoting the intestinal helminthic infections of the domestic mountain ponies and Balkan donkeys in Serbia.

Materials and Methods

The largest population of autochthonous domestic mountain pony and Balkan donkey kept in free-range grazing system in Serbia is located on Mountain Stara Planina (42°43′00″N 24°55′04″E). This is the highest mountain in South-East Serbia. Stara Planina (Balkan mountain) is the Southern Karpathian fold stretching for 560 km from Vlashka Chuka Peak fist to the North on the border between Serbia and Bulgaria and then folding East through Central Bulgaria to Cape Emine on the Black Sea, thus framing the Pannonian Basin on the South of the Danube (Fig. 1). Stara Planina has a characteristic climate changing from moderate continental, mountain (Alpine) and on the high peaks subarctic. Going from low to higher slopes, the average temperature drops while humidity increases. With an average temperature of 0.5 °C, the coldest month is Jan, while July with 22 o C is the warmest. Average annual rainfall is 960.5 mm.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Map of sampling area - Encircled part of the map

Nature Park Stara Planina in Serbia is the largest area of protected nature including both wildlife and autochthonous domesticated species. It is ancient grazing territory were pastoral rural culture was developed through centuries, so this territory became an important site for the development of in situ conservation of autochthonous animals in Serbia. Preservation of the animal breeding tradition and special cultural and ethnic tradition are promoted within the local community and local municipalities have declared the preservation of agro biodiversity as priority Serbia. It is also the traditional grazing area where herbivorous domestic animals were bred historically and animal production was developed through centuries.

Stara Planina with its huge grassland area is famous for its agro biodiversity being the traditional free-range breeding area for horses, donkeys and ruminants. Nowadays the rural settlements are depopulating, so the number of animals is decreasing and the herds and flocks are small. The extensive animal breeding with animals grazing on any natural grassland and after harvest, on wheat, oats and barley stubble was practiced through history by nomads and settled farmers in the area.

Methods

The research was conducted from May to Sep 2015, on several locations on Stara Planina. Fecal samples were collected from 39 horses (29 females and 10 males), aged 1 to 6 years. At the same time, the samples were obtained from 18 donkeys (12 females and 6 males).

All animals were free ranging on pasture. The animals included in the research were clinically healthy, in good condition and untreated with antiparasitic medications, upon the data obtained from the attending veterinarian.

The fresh fecal samples were either collected from the rectum of each animal examined, or, if this was not possible, via identification and collection of fresh droppings. Each fecal sample was individually stored, labeled with the name, age, sex of the animal and the collection date and transported to the Laboratory of Parasitology in the Scientific Veterinary Institute of Serbia (Belgrade).

The presence of parasite eggs in feces was revealed by flotation method with supersatu-rated saline (NaCl) solution, while larvae of lungworms were discovered by Berman method (20). The intensity of infection (number of eggs per gram - EPG) was determined using the McMaster method. At same time, Clayton-Lane method, which is specific for examination of horse faecal samples, was applied (20). The identification of the parasite eggs was performed according to its morphological characteristics (20,21). The level of infection was defined according to Upjohn et al (22) as none, mild (<500 egg per gram (EPG)), moderate (500–1000 EPG) and high (>1000 EPG).

Data Analysis

Software: GraphPad Prism ver. 7.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses of the data obtained. The association between the factors identified as important for parasitic infection and prevalence of helminths in equines was evaluated by χ2 test. The significance of the differences, of faecal egg count was established by Student’s t-test at levels 0.05 and 0.01.

Results

The overall prevalence of GIT nematode infection in horses and donkeys was 97.43% and 88.88%, respectively. The identified parasites were Trichostrongylus axei in 84.61% (33/39), Strongylus edentatus in 46.15% (18/39), S. vulgaris in 5.13% (2/39), Parascaris equorum in 58.97% (23/39), Dictyocaulus arnfieldi in 94.87% (37/39) and Anoplocephala magna in 38.46% (15/39) of the horses. The result showed the significant association of age (χ2=20.73, P<0.01) and gender (χ2=5.65, P<0.05) of horses with the occurrence of Anoplocephala magna infection. In addition, gender was significantly associated (χ2=13.33, P<0.01) with the occurrence of P. equorum infection in horses (Table 1). Significant differences in the infection intensity between young and adult, male and female animals was not detected (P<0.05) for other GIT nematode.

Table 1:

Overall prevalence of major gastrointestinal helminthes in horses vs. risk factors

Helminthes Age Gender

Young (1–3 yr) (n=12) Adult (3–6 yr) (n=27) Male (n=10) Female (n=29)
Prevalence n (%)
Trichostrongylus axei 11 (91.67) 22 (81.48) 7 (70.00) 26 (89.66)
Strongylus edentatus 3 (25.00) 15 (55.56) 4 (40.00) 14 (48.28)
Strongylus vulgaris - 2 (7.41) 1 (10.00) 1 (3.45)
Dictyocaulus arnfieldi 11 (91.67) 26 (96.30) 10 (100.00) 27 (93.10)
Parascaris equorum 6 (50.00) 17 (62.96) 1 (10.00)A 22 (75.86)A
Anoplocephala magna 11 (91.67)A 4 (14.81)A 7 (46.67)a 8 (53.33)a

Same letters in the same row indicate statistically significant difference (a P<0.05; A P<0.01) at each factor

The identified helminths in donkeys were D. arnfieldi in 55.55% (10/18), T. axei in 38.89% (7/18), P. equorum in 27.77% (5/18), S. vulgaris in 33.33% (6/18), A. magna in 22.22% (4/18), and S. westeri in 22.22% (4/18) of animals included in the monitoring. Significant differences in the intensity of infection between young and adult animals were not detected (P≥0.05) (Table 2). GIT helminth infection in donkeys was significantly associated with the gender (χ2=4.08, P=0.04) of the animals included in the study.

Table 2:

Overall prevalence of major gastrointestinal helminthes of donkey vs. risk factors

Helminthes Age Gender

Young (1–3 yr) (n=8) Adult (3–6 yr) (n=10) Male (n=6) Female (n=12)
Prevalence n (%)
Trichostrongylus axei 1 (12.50) 6 (60.00) 2 (33.33) 5 (41.67)
Strongylus vulgaris - 6 (60.00) 1 (16.67) 5 (41.67)
Strongyloides westeri 4 (50.00) - 3 (50.00)a 1 (8.33)a
Dictyocaulus arnfieldi 3 (37.50) 7 (70.00) 3 (50.00) 7 (58.33)
Parascaris equorum 3 (37.50) 2 (20.00) 1 (16.67) 4 (33.33)
Anoplocephala magna 2 (25.00) 2 (20.00) 1 (16.67) 3 (25.00)

Same letters in the same row indicate statistically significant difference (a P<0.05; A P<0.01) of each factor

The mean EPG-s for donkeys and horses were 369.9 and 250.2, respectively (Table 3). Out of 38 infected horses, 13.15% were mildly infected, 50.00% moderately and 36% highly (Fig. 2). The levels of infection for donkeys and horses were summarized in Fig. 2. Mean EPG recorded in adult animals was significantly higher (P<0.05) compared to young donkeys. However, species and gender were not established as significant risk factors influencing mean helminth EPG in each equine species.

Table 3:

Analysis of EPG variation in relation to risk factors

Risk fac-tors No. of infected animals Mean of EPG Standard error 95 % CI P-value
Species
Horse 38 250.2 19.66 211.2–289.1 0.009
Donkey 16 369.9 49.42 269.4–470.3
Gender
Male 15 366.5 83.7 184.2–548.9 0.943
Female 39 359.4 56.43 242.9–475.9
Age
Young 17 220.1a 30.88 158.1–282.1 0.0435
Adult 37 302.1a 23.44 255.6–348.5

Same letters in the same column indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05); 95% CI 95% confidence interval of mean EPG

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Level of infection upon the total egg count in horses and donkeys in Nature Reserve Stara Planina

Discussion

D. arnfieldi is a common parasite of horses (23, 24). This was confirmed during our research i.e. establishing high prevalence of the parasite in horses and donkeys (94.87% and 55.55%, respectively). The disease is common in the pastures where donkeys and horses graze together. Donkeys are a lot more susceptible to these parasites than horses (14,25). However, the simultaneous grazing of horses and donkeys, observed in our monitoring allowed constant parasitic loading of the pasture through elimination by both horses and donkeys allowed constant infection of both equines regardless of the species susceptibility.

T. axei is a common parasite of ruminants in Serbia and the world (26). It was found in horses in Europe, in the Middle East and in the United States (2729).

P. equorum, is a widespread disease in both young and older horses. The disease is prevalent in the world and has a great importance in the pathology of the horse (3032). The data obtained in our research also established infection with P. equorum as a frequent disease in both horses and donkeys on Stara Planina, which is in accord with the data from literature concerning the stabled horses breed in Serbia (17, 18).

Of the species of the genus Strongylus dominate S. vulgaris, followed by S. edentatus and S. equinus (33, 34). Exogenous development of these parasites is similar. The eggs via faeces reach the external environment where they embrionate under favorable conditions. Horses are infected by ingestion of infective larvae through contaminated food and water.

S. edentatus is a common parasite of horses widespread in the world. The S. edentatus is pathogenic helminth species for equines (34). Their presence is associated with very severe disease and intestinal colic and the outcome of the infection in foals can be lethal (9, 32, 33, 35).

S. vulgaris is a helminth whose larvae penetrate the wall of the cecum and nest after infection. After about a week, they break through the arterioles, venules and lymphatic vessels and migrate upstream to larger arteries (9, 34). S. westeri was found only in donkeys and are common parasites in this equine.

A. magna is often present in horses in Serbia, in areas where there are conditions for the persistence of an intermediate host of parasites-nonparasitic mites from the family Oribatidae. This disease is also widespread around the world (3538).

The mean EPG was significantly higher in donkeys than in horses stationed on Stara Planina. This finding could be the result of poor management, overwork stress and immune-compromised responses in donkeys and in other equines with poor body condition score (39). Similarly, the differences among species in concern to susceptibility to nematodes could be controlled by better management practices and inherent immune capability (40). Therefore, poor management and inadequate plan of nutrition could decompensate the immune status of equines, which in return, could create a favorable condition to heavy parasitic infections (41). Even though there was no significant variation, higher mean EPG was recorded in older, compared to adult and young equines. The observed higher mean EPG in older equines in our report may be attributed to the compromised immune response related to ageing animals.

Conclusion

The helminth infection established in horses was high, with an overall prevalence of 97.43%. Higher overall prevalence of helminth infection was recorded in all horses followed by T. axei, A. magna and D. arnfieldi, while P. equorum and D. arnfieldi was more prevalent problems in young horses. There were equines suffering from high levels of infection with major helminths. Therefore, this information might help in designing strategies to control endoparasites infection in nature reserve Stara Planina, in Serbia. More emphasis should be given to planning of management that would include deworming strategy

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  • 1.Trailović R. Phylogenetic evaluation of Yugoslav Mountain pony upon genetic markers, PhD thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Djermanović V, Mitrović S, Djordjević N. Exterior characteristics of the horse breed population of “Posavac“ breed in the region of Eastern Serbia, Proceedings of the 47th Croatian and 7th International Symposium on Agriculture. Opatija Croatia. 2012;699–673. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trailović R, Djermanović V, Savić M, et al. Autochthonous breeds of horses and donkeys in Serbia: Status and perspectives. Proceedings of Fourth Regional Symposium, Breeding, reproduction and health care of horses“. Novi Sad. 2013;47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trailović R, Savić M, Dimitrijević V, et al. Protein polymorphism as indicator of influence of diluvial ancestry on domesticated mountain pony population in Serbia. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the World Equine Veterinary Association WEVA, Budapest, Hungary. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mitrović S, Djermanović V, Trailović R, et al. Equine selective breeding in Serbia: Status and Perspectives. Proceedings of the 2nd Regional Symposium ”Breeding, reproduction and health care of horses“, Novi Sad. 2011;47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Trailovic R, Ivanov S, Dimitrijevic V, Trailovic D. Some morphological and health characteristics of domestic Balkan donkey in Stara planina. Proceedings of 2nd International Fair of Horse Breeding. 2011; 30:180–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stanišić Lj, Dimitrijević V, Simeunović P, et al. Morphological, biochemical and hematological characterization of endangered Balkan donkey breed. Acta Veterinaria. 2015;65(1):125–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pereira JR, Vianna SS. Gastrointestinal parasitic worms in equines in the Paraíba Valley, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 140(3–4):289–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pavlović I, Trailović D, Živković S, et al. Parasitic diseases of horses in Serbia and region, Proceedings of the 5th Regional Symposium Breeding, reproduction and health care of horses, Novi Sad. 2014;41–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carolynn MA, David WF. Controlling common internal parasites of the horse, Division of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University. 2007. Available from: http://osufacts.okstate.edu [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kuzmina TA, Kharchenko VA, Starovir AI, et al. Analysis of the strongylid nematodes (Nematoda: Strongylidae) community after deworming of brood horses in Ukraine. Vet Parasitol. 2005;131:283–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuzmina TA, Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, et al. Fecundity of various species of strongylids (Nematoda: Strongylidae) parasites of domestic horses. Parasitol Res. 2012; 111(6):2265–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kuzmina TA, Kharchenko VA, Zvegintsova NS. Comparative study of the intestinal strongylid communities of equidae in the Askania-Nova biosphere reserve, Ukraine. Helminthologia. 2007;44:62–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Uslu U, Guclu F. Prevalence of endoparasites in horses and donkeys in Turkey. Bulletin Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 2007;51(2):237–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Corning S. Equine cyathostomins: a review of biology, clinical significance and therapy. Parasit Vectors. 2009; 2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nielsen MK. Sustainable equine parasite control: perspectives and research needs. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 185(1):32–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Šilobad S. Gastrointestinal helminthiasis in horses on Zobnatica stud farm, Master thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade. 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Perović M. Gastrointestinal helminthiasis in horses in the region of Chantavir, Serbia, Specialization thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jasavić Z. Parasitic diseases in cattle, sheep and horses in the region of Plav, Montenegro, Specialization thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Euzeby J. Diagnostic expérimental des helminthoses animales. ITVS Paris. 1981; 65–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM. Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (Strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Vet Parasitol. 2008; 156(1–2):4–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Upjohn MM, Shipton K, Lerotholi T, et al. Coprological prevalence and intensity of helminth infection in working horses in Lesotho. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010; 42(8):1655–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Morariu S, Bogdan AT, Dărăbuş G. Helminth parasites in horses from ten locations of Timiş County. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. 2012; 69:381–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Papazahariadou M, Papadopoulos E, Diakou A, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of stabled and grazing horses in central and northern Greece. J Equine Vet Sci. 2009;29:233–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boyle AG, Houston R. Parasitic pneumonitis and treatment in horses. Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice. 2006;5:225–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pavlović I, Anđelić-Buzančić G. Parasitology and parasitic diseases of domestic animals, High school of agriculture, Šabac. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fikru R, Reta D, Teshale S, Bizunesh M. Prevalence of equine gastrointestinal parasites in Western highlands of Oromia, Ethiopia. Bulletin of animal health and production in Africa. Bulletin des santé et production animales en Afrique. 2005; 53:161–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Krecek RC, Reinecke RK, Horak IG. Internal parasites of horses on mixed grassveld and bushveld in Transvaal, Republic of South Africa. Vet Parasitol. 1989; 34(1–2):135–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rehbein S, Visser M, Yoon S, et al. Efficacy of a combination ivermectin/praziquantel paste against nematodes, cestodes and bots in naturally infected ponies. Vet Rec. 2007; 161(21):722–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vujić B. Parasitic fauna of horses in mountain region of Serbia: prophylaxis and treatment. Veterinarski Glasnik. 1983;3:209–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kornaś S, Skalska M, Nowosad B. Occurrence of roundworm (Parascaris equorum) in horses from small farms based on necropsy. Wiad Parazytol. 2006; 52(4):323–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matthee S, McGeoch MA. Helminths in horses: use of selective treatment for the control of strongyles. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2004; 75(3):129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kyvsgaard NC, Lindbom J, Andreasen LL, et al. Prevalence of strongyles and efficacy of fenbendazole and ivermectin in working horses in El Sauce, Nicaragua. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 181(2–4):248–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pilo C, Altea A, Pirino S, et al. Strongylus vulgaris (Looss, 1900) in horses in Italy: Is it still a problem? Vet Parasitol. 2012; 184(2–4):161–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Walden HS, Ness SAL, Mittel LD, et al. Miscellaneous parasitic diseases. In: Sellon DC, Long DT.Equine infectious diseases, 2nd ed, Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, 2014;505–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gasser RB, Williamson RMC, Beveridge I. Anoplocephala perfoliata of horses - significant scope for further research, improved diagnosis and control. Parasitology. 2005; 131(Pt 1):1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Slocombe J. Owen D. A modified critical test and its use in two dose titration trials to assess efficacy of praziquantel for Anoplocephala perfoliata in equids. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 136(2):127–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Owen J, Slocombe D. Pathogenesis of helminths in equines. Vet Parasitol. 1985; 18(2):139–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Traversa D, Fichi G, Campigli M, et al. A comparison of coprological, serological and molecular methods for the diagnosis of horse infection with Anoplocephala perfoliata (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Vet Parasitol. 2008; 152(3–4):271–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Singh B, Ram H, Banerjee PS, et al. Epidemio-logical aspects of gastrointestinal parasites of equines in Uttaranchal and Uttar Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2002; 72(10):861–862. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Valdéz-Cruz MP, Hernández-Gil M, Galindo-Rodríguez L, et al. Gastrointestinal nematode burden in working equids from humid tropical areas of central Veracruz, Mexico, and its relationship with body condition and haematological values. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013; 45(2):603–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES