Table 4.
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | P | B | P | B | P | |
Model with only main effect | ||||||
Negative life events | 0.046 | <0.001 | 0.045 | <0.001 | 0.029 | <0.001 |
Positive coping style | −0.036 | <0.001 | −0.041 | <0.001 | -0.021 | 0.003 |
Negative coping style | 0.065 | <0.001 | 0.062 | <0.001 | 0.029 | 0.020 |
Model with interactions | ||||||
Negative life events | 0.054 | <0.001 | 0.052 | <0.001 | 0.035 | <0.001 |
Positive coping style | −0.033 | 0.111 | −0.039 | 0.062 | -0.032 | 0.131 |
Negative coping style | 0.110 | 0.001 | 0.100 | 0.003 | 0.090 | 0.009 |
Negative life events and Positive coping style | 0.000 | 0.803 | 0.000 | 0.852 | 0.000 | 0.633 |
Negative life events and Negative coping style | −0.001 | 0.143 | −0.001 | 0.222 | -0.001 | 0.057 |
Note:
Model 1: Unadjusted
Model 2: Adjusted for gender and grade
Model 3: Adjusted for gender, grade, school type, family type, fathers’ education level, mothers’ education level, smoking, drinking alcohol, physical exercise, self-rated health, self-perceived study stress, and depressive symptoms
P was calculated by analysis of multivariable logistic regression