Table 2.
Compositeb |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item Number | Rating Item | Score Rangea | Responsive | Directive | Overall |
1 | Face to Face | 1–5 | X | ||
2 | Follow the Child’s Lead | 1–5 | X | X | |
3 | Positive Affect | 1–5 | X | ||
4 | Modeling Language | 1–5 | X | X | |
5 | Responding to Communication | 1–5 | X | X | |
6 | Pace Verbal Models | 1–5 | X | X | |
7 | Communication Temptations | 0–5 | X | X | |
8 | Frequency of Direct Teaching | 0–5 | X | X | |
9 | Quality of Direct Teaching | 0–5 | X | X |
Note.
all items were scored on a 1–5 Likert scale, but score ranges containing a 0 indicate that NA was selected when the strategy never occurred;
composite scores are calculated by averaging all applicable rating items