Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Jul 7;9(9):613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.04.013

Table 5.

Reclassification Analyses for Prognostic Value of Urinary and Plasma CNP Levels for Clinical Outcomes in ADHF Patients

Model C-statistic IDI (95% CI) Relative IDI (95% CI) P value
Rehospitalization/Death
Base model 0.59 (0.54, 0.63)
Base model + uCNP/pCNP groups 0.60 (0.56, 0.65) 0.028 (0.003, 0.079)* 46.5% (0.2%, 174.0%)* 0.005*
Base model + NT-proBNP 0.60 (0.55, 0.64)
Base model + NT-proBNP + uCNP/pCNP groups 0.61 (0.56, 0.65) 0.022 (0.001, 0.072)# 30.0% (0.0%, 115.0%)# 0.01#
Rehospitalization
Base model 0.59 (0.53, 0.64)
Base model + uCNP/pCNP groups 0.60 (0.55, 0.65) 0.034 (0.003, 0.095)* 49.1% (0.2%, 185.0%)* 0.004*
Base model + NT-proBNP 0.59 (0.54, 0.65)
Base model + NT-proBNP + uCNP/pCNP groups 0.61 (0.55, 0.66) 0.036 (0.004, 0.103)# 45.8% (0.6%, 164.0%)# 0.004#

Base model included age, sex, eGFR, urinary protein/creatinine ratio and LVEF.

uCNP/pCNP groups, the 4 subgroups based on urinary and plasma CNP levels as indicated in Table 3 and Table 4.

*

IDI analyses compared to base model

#

IDI analyses compared to base model + NT-proBNP; the 95% CIs and P values were calculated based on 1000 bootstrap samples.

IDI = integrated discrimination index; CI = confident interval.