Abstract
Background:
The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has led to a significant reduction in Kaposi sarcoma (KS) incidence among people with HIV (PWH). However, it is unclear if incidence has declined similarly across key demographic and HIV transmission groups and the annual number of incident and prevalent KS cases remains unquantified.
Methods:
Using population-based registry linkage data, we evaluated temporal trends in KS incidence using adjusted Poisson regression. Incidence and prevalence estimates were applied to CDC HIV surveillance data, to obtain the number of incident (2008–2015) and prevalent (2015) cases in the United States.
Results:
Among PWH, KS rates were elevated 521-fold (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 498, 536) compared to the general population and declined from 109 per 100,000 person-years in 2000 to 47 per 100,000 person-years in 2015, at an annual percentage change of −6%. Rates declined substantially (p-trend<0∙005) across all demographic and HIV transmission groups. Of the 5,306 new cases estimated between 2008 and 2015, 89% occurred among men who have sex with men. At the end of 2015, 1,904 PWH (0.20%) had been diagnosed with KS in the previous 5 years.
Conclusions:
A consistent gradual decline in KS incidence has occurred among PWH in the United States during the current cART era. This decrease is uniform across key demographic and HIV transmission groups, though rates remain elevated relative to the general population.
Impact:
Continued efforts to control HIV through early cART initiation and retention in care need to be maintained and possibly expanded to sustain declines.
Keywords: HIV seropositivity, AIDS-related cancer, Kaposi sarcoma, cancer surveillance, men who have sex with men
Introduction
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a rare malignancy caused by Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) (1) that occurs at highly elevated rates among persons with HIV (PWH) (2–4). KS is an AIDS-defining condition and is an indication of immune suppression (5). Though KS rates are elevated across subgroups of PWH, men who have sex with men (MSM) have the highest risk, (6–10) likely due to a higher prevalence of KSHV infection (11).
The use of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) to treat HIV began in 1996 in the United States and has become increasingly widespread, leading to significant reductions in KS rates among PWH (12–14). Relative to the general population, KS rates in PWH were elevated 2,800-fold in the pre-cART era (1991–1995) (15) and 260-fold in 2009–12 (14). Despite this dramatic decrease in KS rates, it remains unclear if rates have declined similarly across demographic and HIV transmission groups in the United States, or if KS rates are actually increasing in some groups, as two recent studies have suggested (16,17). Identifying groups with increasing or even stable KS rates is critical, as KS may be an indicator of poor HIV control.
Recognizing these gaps in the epidemiology of KS, we utilized linked cancer and HIV registry data to identify a cohort of HIV-infected people to describe temporal trends in the incidence of KS over a recent 16-year period, both overall and within selected demographic and HIV transmission groups. In addition, we estimated the number of annual incident KS cases during 2008–2015 and the number of people diagnosed with KS in the last 5 years (5-year prevalence of KS) among PWH in the United States at the end of 2015.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Study Population
Data were obtained from the HIV/AIDS Cancer Match (HACM) study, which is a population-based linkage study of 12 state and regional cancer and HIV registries across the United States (https://hivmatch.cancer.gov/). Specifically, data from Colorado (2000–2015), Connecticut (2005–2015), Georgia (2004–2012), Louisiana (2000–2015), Maryland (2008–2012), Michigan (2000–2015), North Carolina (2000–2014), New Jersey (2000–2012), New York (2001–2012), Puerto Rico (2003–2012), Texas (2000–2015) and Washington DC (2007–2015) were utilized. PWH were identified from the HIV registries, and follow-up for participants began at the latter of January 1 of the calendar year at the start of coverage for each registry, and the first of a person’s HIV report date or AIDS diagnosis date. Participants 15 years or older were followed-up until death, the end of registry coverage or the end of our study period on December 31, 2015.
KS diagnosis, which was the outcome of interest, was identified in cancer registries using the ICD-O-3 histology code 9140 (18). Incident KS cases were defined as those with a KS diagnosis 4 or more months following HIV or AIDS diagnosis date. New KS cases recorded by the cancer registry 0 to 3 months after the earliest of HIV or AIDS diagnosis date were considered prevalent KS cases as the risk of KS is very high during this time period, likely due to concurrent diagnosis of HIV and cancer and cancer diagnosed during clinical work up related to new HIV diagnosis.
The state health departments of all states and Washington, DC, submit data on all HIV diagnoses to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National HIV Surveillance System. These national HIV surveillance data were adjusted for missing risk factor data (19) and were available for the full United States population during 2008–2015.
Statistical Analysis
Incident KS rates relative to the general population were estimated with standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with data from the HACM Study. SIRs compared the observed incident KS cases among PWH to the expected number of cases based on general population rates, standardized by age, sex and race (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black). As HIV-associated KS cases strongly influence general population rates, incidence rates recorded for the general population prior to the start of the HIV epidemic (before 1980) from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data were used to calculate the expected case counts (20,21). SIRs were calculated overall, and by age groups (<30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59 and ≥60 years), sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic) and HIV transmission groups (MSM, male and female persons who inject drugs (PWID), male heterosexual/other, female heterosexual/other). The heterosexual/other category included those infected through mother to child transmission, receipt of clotting factor, transfusion/transplant or an undetermined transmission route.
Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) were estimated for age groups, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission groups and time since HIV diagnosis (0∙33–2, 2∙01–5, 5∙01–10, 10∙01–15, 15∙01–20, >20 years), and were also adjusted for registry and calendar year using Poisson regression models. Annual changes in rates were estimated using Poisson regression with single calendar years as a linear term, adjusting for 5-year age groups, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission groups, and registry. Adjusted annual incidence rates for each calendar year were obtained as marginal estimates from these models (22,23). Trends were assessed within strata defined by age groups (<30, 30–49, ≥50 years), race/ethnicity and HIV transmission groups. To examine if our observed trends were unduly influenced by the four HACM registries that had data beyond 2012, we compared the temporal trends in incidence for the period 2000–2012 to that of our entire 16-year period. As no difference was observed, trends were evaluated based on all available years. Joinpoint regression (24) was used to assess whether there were significant changes in the trajectory of incidence rates over time. In a sensitivity analysis, only those cases diagnosed 0 to 1 month after HIV report or AIDS diagnosis were excluded from incidence analysis.
To obtain annual estimates of the number of new KS cases (i.e. burden of incident KS cases) among persons with HIV during 2008–2015, incidence rates were estimated from the Poisson models described above in strata defined by age group, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission group and calendar years. Rate estimates included both incident KS cases and new cases diagnosed 0–3 months after the start of follow-up, considered to be prevalent in our study, in order to fully capture the annual number of new KS cases in the United States. These predicted incidence rates using HACM data were then multiplied by CDC estimates of the number of PWH in the United States in the same strata.
The 5-year limited-duration prevalence of KS in the United States at the end of 2015 was estimated using data on both incident and prevalent (diagnosed 0–3 months after the start of follow-up) KS cases at the end of each calendar year (2010–2015) restricted to people 15 years or older. A generalized estimation equation (GEE) logistic regression model was used to account for repeated observations of participants in each calendar year with the predicted 5-year KS prevalence as the outcome. This model was adjusted for age group, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission group, registry and year. To quantify the number of PWH alive at the end of 2015 who had a KS diagnosis in the past 5 years, the 5-year limited duration KS prevalence was predicted based on HACM data from the GEE model in strata defined by age group, HIV transmission group and race/ethnicity and multiplied by the corresponding stratum specific total population of PWH in the United States in 2015, using CDC surveillance data. Except for the 5-year limited-duration prevalence where a parametric bootstrap was utilized, confidence intervals for incidence and burden estimates for the United States are based on non-parametric bootstrap resampling. All analyses were carried out in SAS (version 9∙4).
Results
Characteristics of KS Rates among PWH
From 2000–2015, 2,837 incident KS cases occurred during 4,488,522 person-years of follow-up in the HACM Study (Table 1) and the overall crude incidence rate during this period was 63∙2 per 100,000 person-years (81∙2 in men and 15∙8 in women). In addition, a total of 1,492 KS cases occurred during the first 3 months after HIV or AIDS diagnosis. By the demographic and HIV transmission groups examined, 70∙7% of incident KS cases occurred among PWH aged 30–49 years, 93∙1% occurred among men, 25∙8% among non-Hispanic White PWH, 48∙7% among non-Hispanic Black PWH, 24.3% among Hispanic PWH and 70∙1% occurred among MSM. The overall SIR was 521 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 502, 540, Table 1) with the highest SIRs occurring among <30-year-olds (SIR: 358,000; 95% CI: 322,000, 397,000, Table 1), females (SIR: 680; 95% CI: 588, 783) and among MSM (SIR: 809; 95% CI: 774, 845).
Table 1:
Characteristics of incident Kaposi sarcoma (KS) cases, person-years contributed and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) among people with HIV in the HIV/AIDS Cancer Match Study, 2000 to 2015.
Characteristics | Incident cases | Person-years | SIR (95% CI) | Crude IR/100,000 person-years | IRR (95% CI) | aIRRa (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | 2,837 | 4,488,522 | 521 (502, 540) | 63.2 | - | - |
Attained age group, years | ||||||
15–29 | 363 | 444,533 | 358,000 (322,000, 397,000) | 81∙7 | Ref | Ref |
30–39 | 997 | 1,008,366 | 3,410 (3,210, 3,630) | 98∙9 | 1∙21 (1∙07, 1∙37) | 1∙31 (1∙16, 1∙49) |
40–49 | 1,010 | 1,644,373 | 873 (820, 929) | 61∙4 | 0∙75 (0∙67, 0∙85) | 0∙94 (0∙83, 1∙07) |
50–59 | 382 | 1,041,065 | 181 (164, 201) | 36∙7 | 0∙45 (0∙39, 0∙52) | 0∙66 (0∙57, 0∙77) |
≥ 60 | 85 | 350,184 | 45 (36, 56) | 24∙3 | 0∙30 (0∙23, 0∙38) | 0∙47 (0∙37, 0∙60) |
Race/Ethnicity | ||||||
Non-Hispanic White | 733 | 1,168,603 | 458 (426, 493) | 62∙7 | Ref | Ref |
Non-Hispanic Black | 1,381 | 2,189,236 | 513 (486, 541) | 63∙1 | 1∙01 (0∙92, 1∙10) | 1∙50 (1∙36, 1∙65) |
Hispanic | 692 | 1,063,049 | 599 (555, 645) | 65∙1 | 1∙04 (0∙94, 1∙15) | 1∙27 (1∙14, 1∙42) |
Other/unknownb | 31 | 67,634 | - | 45∙8 | 0∙73 (0∙51, 1∙05) | 0∙83 (0∙58, 1∙19) |
HIV transmission group | ||||||
MSM | 1,990 | 1,843,723 | 809 (774, 845) | 107∙9 | Ref | Ref |
Male and Female PWID | 270 | 813,065 | 238 (210, 268) | 33∙2 | 0∙31 (0∙27, 0∙35) | 0∙33 (0∙29, 0∙37) |
Male heterosexual/other | 451 | 873,030 | 279 (254, 306) | 51∙7 | 0∙48 (0∙43, 0∙53) | 0∙46 (0∙41, 0∙51) |
Female heterosexual/other | 126 | 958,703 | 529 (441, 630) | 13∙1 | 0∙12 (0∙10, 0∙15) | 0∙11 (0∙09, 0∙13) |
Time since HIV diagnosis, years | ||||||
0∙33–2 | 534 | 400,471 | - | 133∙3 | Ref | Ref |
2∙01–5 | 572 | 798,328 | - | 71∙6 | 0∙54 (0∙48, 0∙60) | 0∙56 (0∙50, 0∙64) |
5∙01–10 | 791 | 1,239,405 | - | 63∙8 | 0∙48 (0∙43, 0∙53) | 0∙55 (0∙49, 0∙62) |
10∙01–15 | 391 | 867,369 | - | 45∙1 | 0∙34 (0∙30, 0∙39) | 0∙44 (0∙39, 0∙51) |
15∙01–20 | 173 | 442,903 | - | 39∙1 | 0∙29 (0∙25, 0∙35) | 0∙44 (0∙37, 0∙53) |
>20 | 48 | 165,100 | - | 29∙1 | 0∙22 (0∙16, 0∙29) | 0∙37 (0∙27, 0∙50) |
Unknown | 328 | 574,946 | - | 57∙0 | 0∙43 (0∙37, 0∙49) | 0∙50 (0∙43, 0∙57) |
In addition to calendar year and the 12 state and regional cancer and HIV registries, aIRR are mutually adjusted for other variables in the table.
This category comprised Asian Americans, American Indians and those with an unknown racial/ethnicity classification.
Note: Data is shown only for persons with 4 or more months of follow-up in the study. An SIR was not calculated for the other/unknown category of race/ethnicity, because there is no expected case count for this category in the general population.
IR= incidence rate, aIRR= adjusted incidence rate ratios, MSM= men who have sex with men, PWID= people who inject drug
The aIRRs presented in Table 1 show that compared to 15–29-year-olds, KS incidence rates were significantly higher among 30–39-year-olds (1∙31; 95% CI: 1∙16, 1∙49, Table 1); however, in people 50 years or older rates were significantly lower (aIRR range: 0∙47–0∙66). Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, KS incidence was also significantly higher among non-Hispanic Blacks (1∙50; 95% CI: 1∙36, 1∙65) and Hispanics (1∙27; 95% CI: 1∙14, 1∙42). By HIV transmission group and time since HIV diagnosis, MSM and those with a recent HIV diagnosis, respectively had the highest KS incidence (Table 1). Results were similar when incident cases were defined as those occurring more than one month after HIV report date or AIDS diagnosis date.
Trends in KS Incidence Rates, 2000–2015
During 2000–2015, KS rates declined an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 6∙1% per year (95% CI: −7∙0, −5∙2% per year, Table 2) from an adjusted annual incidence rate of 108∙9 per 100,000 person-years in 2000 to 46∙6 per 100,000 person-years in 2015 (Figure 1), although beginning in 2012 we noted an apparent stabilization of KS rates (p=0∙005). Substantial declines (p-trend<0∙005) in KS rates were observed across age groups (AAPC range: −8∙4∙%, −3∙5% per year, Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 1), race/ethnicity (AAPC range: −7∙4%, −5∙4% per year) and HIV transmission groups (AAPC range: −7∙6%, −5∙8% per year). KS rates also declined across all states included in our study (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 2:
Average annual percentage change (AAPC) in Kaposi sarcoma incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) among people with HIV in the HIV/AIDS Cancer Match Study, 2000 to 2015.
AAPCa, %/year (95% CI) | |
---|---|
Overall | −6∙1 (−7∙0, −5∙2) |
Attained age group, years | |
15–29 | −3∙5 (−6∙1, −0∙9) |
30–49 | −5∙5 (−6∙5, −4∙4) |
≥50 | −8∙4 (−10∙6, −6∙1) |
Race/Ethnicity | |
Non-Hispanic White | −6∙1 (−7∙8, −4∙4) |
Non-Hispanic Black | −5∙4 (−6∙7, −4∙0) |
Hispanic | −7∙4 (−9∙2, −5∙6) |
Other/unknownb | −8∙7 (−16∙8, 0∙2) |
HIV transmission group | |
MSM | −5∙8 (−6∙9, −4∙8) |
Male and Female PWID | −7∙6 (−10∙8, −4∙2) |
Male heterosexual/other | −7∙4 (−9∙7, −5∙0) |
Female heterosexual/other | −6∙1 (−10∙5, −1∙4) |
Estimates are adjusted for attained age using 5-yr age groups, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission group, registry and calendar year.
This category comprised Asian Americans, American Indians and those with an unknown racial/ethnicity classification.
Note: Data is shown only for persons with 4 or more months of follow-up.
MSM= men who have sex with men, PWID= people who inject drugs
Figure 1:
Adjusted incidence rate* and 95% confidence intervals of Kaposi sarcoma by calendar year among people with HIV in the United States, 2000 to 2015.
* Adjusted for 5-year age groups, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission groups, and registry
Burden of New KS Cases Among PWH in the United States, 2008–2015
From 2008 to 2015, an estimated 5,306 (95% CI: 5,018, 5,616) incident KS cases occurred among PWH in the United States, declining from 719 incident KS cases in 2008 to 624 incident cases in 2015 (Figure 2). An estimated 23 KS cases occurred among 15–19-year-olds, 968 in 20–29-year-olds, 3,258 in 30–49-year-olds, 798 in 50–59-year-olds and 259 in ≥60-year-olds. Non-Hispanic Blacks (1,981; 37% of cases) and MSM (4,711; 89% of cases) respectively had the highest burden of incident KS cases (Figure 2).
Figure 2:
Number of new Kaposi sarcoma cases among persons with HIV in the United States between 2008 and 2015 (N=5,306), by calendar year (A), age group (B), race/ethnicity (C) and HIV transmission group (D).
Five-year prevalence of KS at the end of 2015
At the end of 2015, 0∙20% (95% CI: 0∙18%, 0∙21%) of PWH in the United States had received a diagnosis of KS within the prior 5 years, corresponding to 1,904 prevalent cases (Table 3). By age group, the proportion of 5-year prevalent KS cases recorded in people <30 years was 0∙21% (n=215 cases), 30–39 years 0∙30% (n=486), 40–49 years 0∙22% (n=539), 50–59 years 0∙17% (n=497) and those 60 years or older had the lowest 5-year prevalence of 0∙11% (n=166). By racial/ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics had the highest KS prevalence of 0∙24% (n=712) and 0∙22% (n=458) respectively, and by HIV transmission group MSM had the highest prevalence [0∙29% (n=1,686), Table 3].
Table 3:
Five-year prevalence of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) among people with HIV in the United States at the end of 2015
Number of prevalent KS cases | KS prevalencea, % (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|
Overall | 1904 | 0∙20 (0∙18, 0∙21) |
Attained age group, years | ||
15–29 | 215 | 0∙21 (0∙16, 0∙23) |
30–39 | 486 | 0∙30 (0∙26, 0∙32) |
40–49 | 539 | 0∙22 (0∙19, 0∙24) |
50–59 | 497 | 0∙17 (0∙15, 0∙18) |
≥60 | 166 | 0∙11 (0∙09, 0∙14) |
Race/Ethnicity | ||
Non-Hispanic White | 712 | 0∙24 (0∙21, 0∙26) |
Non-Hispanic Black | 616 | 0∙15 (0∙13, 0∙16) |
Hispanic | 458 | 0∙22 (0∙20, 0∙25) |
Other/unknownb | 117 | 0∙20 (0∙16, 0∙30) |
HIV transmission group | ||
MSM | 1686 | 0∙29 (0∙26, 0∙31) |
Male and Female PWID | 59 | 0∙05 (0∙03, 0∙06) |
Male heterosexual/other | 108 | 0∙13 (0∙11, 0∙15) |
Female heterosexual/other | 51 | 0∙03 (0∙02, 0∙03) |
Estimates are adjusted for age group, race/ethnicity, HIV transmission-group and the 12 state and regional cancer and HIV registries.
This category comprised Asian Americans, American Indians and those with an unknown racial/ethnicity classification.
Note: Five-year prevalence was estimated using data on both incident (diagnosed 4 or more months after the start of follow-up ) and prevalent (diagnosed 0–3 months after the start of follow-up) KS cases.
MSM= men who have sex with men, PWID= people who inject drugs
Discussion
Our findings indicate that from 2000 to 2015 there was a >50% decrease in the incidence of KS among PWH in the United States and the slope of decline was similar across age, racial/ethnic and HIV transmission groups. In 2015, in the United States, among PWH an estimated 624 new cases of KS were diagnosed and the 5-year prevalence of KS was 1,904. The substantial decrease in KS incidence may be attributed to sustained efforts in recent years to diagnose HIV earlier and initiate cART shortly after diagnosis, maintain sustained suppression of HIV RNA, increased availability of cART, tolerability of newer cART regimens, increased adherence to simple formulations with once-daily dosing, and increased linkage of PWH to care and retention in care (25). Continued efforts to expand optimal cART treatment to those less likely to engage in care are needed to sustain or accelerate further declines in KS rates.
Recent reports have shown increasing KS rates among non-Hispanic Blacks, particularly in specific age groups in some southern states (16,17). Though we could not directly compare these published estimates to those in the current study due to differences in the states included in the analyses, we did not find evidence of increasing KS rates in any racial/ethnic group or state. Further, these prior studies utilized the general population as the denominator for rate estimation instead of the population of PWH, preventing the distinction between increasing KS occurrence among PWH and an increase in the at-risk population (i.e. increase in the number of PWH) over time. Subsequent analyses using cancer registry data and CDC HIV surveillance data have not shown increasing KS rates in these groups (26).
KS rates were highest among MSM compared to other HIV transmission groups, likely due to the elevated seroprevalence and the increased rate of sexual transmission of KSHV in MSM (11). This finding is also consistent with the 2-fold elevation in the seroprevalence of KSHV among PWID who are MSM compared to PWID who are male heterosexuals (27). KS incidence declined with increasing age. This is in contrast with the increased susceptibility to infections that occurs as people age and undergo immune senescence, and the increased risk of classic KS with age among immunocompetent individuals (28). Additionally, prior studies in the general population have shown an age-associated increase in the seroprevalence of KSHV among people 30 years or older (29). However, consistent with our findings, the risk of KS among older PWH has been reported to decrease with increasing time since HIV diagnosis (30,31) and is supported by the higher rate of cART adherence among older PWH (32,33).
Although the 5-year limited duration prevalence of KS among PWH is low the absolute number of prevalent cases in 2015, especially among MSM, is quite notable. The population of prevalent KS cases is likely to continue to grow further, as PWH continue to live longer after a KS diagnosis (34,35) when controlled on cART (34). Therefore; the unique needs of PWH who are KS survivors should be considered, such as their potential increased risk for second cancers (36–38).
A major strength of our study is the use of population-based data from 12 regions across the United States in addition to CDC HIV surveillance data for the whole United States to describe the epidemiologic trends for KS in the current cART era. Secondly, our examination of temporal trends across key demographic and HIV transmission strata has shown consistent declines in KS incidence across major demographic and HIV transmission groups. Additionally, our study includes all persons with diagnosed HIV in the United States and not just those continuously enrolled in care or adherent to cART. However, our findings are limited by the imperfect sensitivity of the HACM data match to identify HIV-infected cancer cases. As the sensitivity of the match has been reported to be 81%, it is likely that the burden of incident KS is underestimated (21). Another limitation of the study is the lack of information on cART and KSHV serostatus and incomplete information on CD4 cell counts and HIV RNA. Further, the 5-year limited duration prevalence at the end of 2015 is an underestimate of the true lifetime prevalence of KS among PWH in United States, as these 5-year limited duration prevalence estimates do not include KS diagnoses occurring prior to 2010.
In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive description over a 16-year period of the current landscape of KS incidence, burden and prevalence across important population subgroups among PWH in the United States. Our findings indicate that though rates remain elevated relative to the general population there has been a consistent gradual decline in KS incidence among PWH in the United States during the current cART era, and this decrease is uniform across the demographic and HIV transmission groups examined. However, the number of PWH with a prior KS diagnosis at the end of 2015 is notable and the unique needs and risk profile of prevalent KS cases should be investigated further. As KS risk is strongly associated with immune suppression, increased HIV viral load and late initiation of cART, the continued strongly elevated risk of KS among PWH highlights the continued need for improvement in utilization of HIV diagnosis and treatment. Current efforts to control HIV in the United States through early initiation of cART, and linkage to and retention in care need to be expanded to sustain the recent declines in KS rates among PWH.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
SP: Sally Peprah; EAE: Eric A. Engels; MJH: Marie-Josèphe Horner; AM: Analise Monterosso; HIH: H. Irene Hall; ASJ: Anna Satcher Johnson; RMP: Ruth M. Pfeiffer; MSS: Meredith S. Shiels SP, EAE, MJH and MSS designed the study. EAE and MSS, who are principal investigators in the HIV/AIDS Cancer Match Study, acquired the data and obtained funding. SP conducted the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. RMP and MSS advised on the statistical analyses. EAE, MJH, RMP and MSS supervised the study. SP, EAE, MJH, AM, HIH, ASJ, RMP and MSS contributed to the interpretation of the data, critically reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The authors thank Timothy McNeel at Information Management Services for programming support.
They also gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance provided by individuals at the following state HIV/AIDS and cancer registries: Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, and Texas.
Funding
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health.
The following cancer registries were supported by the National Program of Cancer Registries of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Colorado (NU58DP006347-01), Georgia (5U58DP003875-01), Louisiana (NU58DP006332-03-00), Maryland (5NU58DP003919-05-00), Michigan (17NU58DP006334), New Jersey (NU58/DP003931-05-00), New York (U58/DP003879), North Carolina (1NU58DP006281) and Texas (1NU58DP006308). District of Columbia is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreement DP006302.
The following cancer registries were supported by the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute: Connecticut (HHSN261201300019I), Louisiana (HHSN261201800007I/ HHSN26100002), and New Jersey (HHSN261201300021I, N01-PC-2013-00021). The New Jersey State Cancer Registry was also supported by the state of New Jersey, the Maryland Cancer Registry was supported by the State of Maryland and the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund, the Louisiana Tumor Registry was also supported by the state of Louisiana (0587200015), and the New York State Cancer Registry was also supported by the state of New York.
The following HIV registries were supported by HIV Incidence and Case Surveillance Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National HIV Surveillance Systems: Colorado (NU62PS003960), Connecticut (5U62PS001005-05), Louisiana (NU62PS924522-02-00), Michigan (U62PS004011-02), New Jersey (U62PS004001-2), New York (PS18-1802) and Texas (NU62PS924529): Integrated HIV Surveillance and Prevention Programs for Health Departments, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be interpreted to reflect the views or official policies of the National Cancer Institute, HIV/AIDS or cancer registries, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or their contractors, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Conflicts of interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Chang Y, Cesarman E, Pessin MS, Lee F, Culpepper J, Knowles DM, et al. Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Science (New York, NY) 1994;266(5192):1865–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mbulaiteye SM, Biggar RJ, Goedert JJ, Engels EA. Immune deficiency and risk for malignancy among persons with AIDS. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2003;32(5):527–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Biggar RJ, Chaturvedi AK, Goedert JJ, Engels EA. AIDS-related cancer and severity of immunosuppression in persons with AIDS. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007;99(12):962–72 doi 10.1093/jnci/djm010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guiguet M, Boue F, Cadranel J, Lang JM, Rosenthal E, Costagliola D. Effect of immunodeficiency, HIV viral load, and antiretroviral therapy on the risk of individual malignancies (FHDH-ANRS CO4): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Oncology 2009;10(12):1152–9 doi 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70282-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports 1992;41(Rr-17):1–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Franceschi S, Maso LD, Rickenbach M, Polesel J, Hirschel B, Cavassini M, et al. Kaposi sarcoma incidence in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study before and after highly active antiretroviral therapy. British journal of cancer 2008;99(5):800–4 doi 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Atkinson JO, Biggar RJ, Goedert JJ, Engels EA. The incidence of Kaposi sarcoma among injection drug users with AIDS in the United States. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2004;37(2):1282–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beral V, Peterman TA, Berkelman RL, Jaffe HW. Kaposi’s sarcoma among persons with AIDS: a sexually transmitted infection? Lancet (London, England) 1990;335(8682):123–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clifford GM, Polesel J, Rickenbach M, Dal Maso L, Keiser O, Kofler A, et al. Cancer risk in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: associations with immunodeficiency, smoking, and highly active antiretroviral therapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005;97(6):425–32 doi 10.1093/jnci/dji072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shiels MS, Pfeiffer RM, Gail MH, Hall HI, Li J, Chaturvedi AK, et al. Cancer burden in the HIV-infected population in the United States. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2011;103(9):753–62 doi 10.1093/jnci/djr076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Martin JN, Ganem DE, Osmond DH, Page-Shafer KA, Macrae D, Kedes DH. Sexual transmission and the natural history of human herpesvirus 8 infection. The New England journal of medicine 1998;338(14):948–54 doi 10.1056/nejm199804023381403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.International Collaboration on HIV and Cancer. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and incidence of cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000;92(22):1823–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Goedert JJ, Virgo P, McNeel TS, Scoppa SM, et al. Trends in cancer risk among people with AIDS in the United States 1980–2002. AIDS (London, England) 2006;20(12):1645–54 doi 10.1097/01.aids.0000238411.75324.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hernandez-Ramirez RU, Shiels MS, Dubrow R, Engels EA. Cancer risk in HIV-infected people in the USA from 1996 to 2012: a population-based, registry-linkage study. The lancet HIV 2017;4(11):e495–e504 doi 10.1016/s2352-3018(17)30125-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Engels EA, Biggar RJ, Hall HI, Cross H, Crutchfield A, Finch JL, et al. Cancer risk in people infected with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. International journal of cancer 2008;123(1):187–94 doi 10.1002/ijc.23487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Royse KE, El Chaer F, Amirian ES, Hartman C, Krown SE, Uldrick TS, et al. Disparities in Kaposi sarcoma incidence and survival in the United States: 2000–2013. PloS one 2017;12(8):e0182750 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0182750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.White DL, Oluyomi A, Royse K, Dong Y, Nguyen H, Chang E, et al. Incidence of AIDS-Related Kaposi Sarcoma in All 50 United States From 2000 to 2014. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2019;81(4):387–94 doi 10.1097/qai.0000000000002050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jack A, Percy C, Shanmugarathan S, Whelan S. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O. World Health Organization; 2000.
- 19.Harrison KM, Kajese T, Hall HI, Song R. Risk factor redistribution of the national HIV/AIDS surveillance data: an alternative approach. Public health reports (Washington, DC : 1974) 2008;123(5):618–27 doi 10.1177/003335490812300512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chaturvedi AK, Mbulaiteye SM, Engels EA. Underestimation of relative risks by standardized incidence ratios for AIDS-related cancers. Annals of epidemiology 2008;18(3):230–4 doi 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shiels MS, Pfeiffer RM, Hall HI, Li J, Goedert JJ, Morton LM, et al. Proportions of Kaposi sarcoma, selected non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and cervical cancer in the United States occurring in persons with AIDS, 1980–2007. Jama 2011;305(14):1450–9 doi 10.1001/jama.2011.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frome EL, Checkoway H. Epidemiologic programs for computers and calculators. Use of Poisson regression models in estimating incidence rates and ratios. American journal of epidemiology 1985;121(2):309–23 doi 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.SAS Institute Inc. 03/27. Usage Note 24188: Modeling rates and estimating rates and rate ratios (with confidence intervals). <http://support.sas.com/kb/24/188.html>. Accessed2019 03/27.
- 24.Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Statistics in medicine 2000;19(3):335–51 doi . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 US dependent areas—2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2017;22(No. 2). . https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-supplemental-report-vol-22-2.pdf2017. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Luo Q, Satcher Johnson A, Hall HI, Cahoon EK, Shiels M. Kaposi Sarcoma Rates Among Persons Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the United States: 2008–2016. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2020. doi 10.1093/cid/ciaa999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Atkinson J, Edlin BR, Engels EA, Kral AH, Seal K, Gamache CJ, et al. Seroprevalence of human herpesvirus 8 among injection drug users in San Francisco. The Journal of infectious diseases 2003;187(6):974–81 doi 10.1086/368332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Iscovich J, Boffetta P, Franceschi S, Azizi E, Sarid R. Classic kaposi sarcoma: epidemiology and risk factors. Cancer 2000;88(3):500–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Engels EA, Atkinson JO, Graubard BI, McQuillan GM, Gamache C, Mbisa G, et al. Risk factors for human herpesvirus 8 infection among adults in the United States and evidence for sexual transmission. The Journal of infectious diseases 2007;196(2):199–207 doi 10.1086/518791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mahale P, Engels EA, Coghill AE, Kahn AR, Shiels MS. Cancer Risk in Older Persons Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in the United States. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2018;67(1):50–7 doi 10.1093/cid/ciy012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Engels EA. Human immunodeficiency virus infection, aging, and cancer. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2001;54Suppl 1:S29–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hinkin CH, Hardy DJ, Mason KI, Castellon SA, Durvasula RS, Lam MN, et al. Medication adherence in HIV-infected adults: effect of patient age, cognitive status, and substance abuse. AIDS (London, England) 2004;18Suppl 1:S19–25 doi 10.1097/00002030-200418001-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ghidei L, Simone MJ, Salow MJ, Zimmerman KM, Paquin AM, Skarf LM, et al. Aging, antiretrovirals, and adherence: a meta analysis of adherence among older HIV-infected individuals. Drugs & aging 2013;30(10):809–19 doi 10.1007/s40266-013-0107-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lodi S, Guiguet M, Costagliola D, Fisher M, de Luca A, Porter K. Kaposi sarcoma incidence and survival among HIV-infected homosexual men after HIV seroconversion. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010;102(11):784–92 doi 10.1093/jnci/djq134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Datta GD, Kawachi I, Delpierre C, Lang T, Grosclaude P. Trends in Kaposi’s sarcoma survival disparities in the United States: 1980 through 2004. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2010;19(11):2718–26 doi 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-10-0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Biggar RJ, Curtis RE, Cote TR, Rabkin CS, Melbye M. Risk of other cancers following Kaposi’s sarcoma: relation to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. American journal of epidemiology 1994;139(4):362–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hessol NA, Whittemore H, Vittinghoff E, Hsu LC, Ma D, Scheer S, et al. Incidence of first and second primary cancers diagnosed among people with HIV, 1985–2013: a population-based, registry linkage study. The lancet HIV 2018;5(11):e647–e55 doi 10.1016/s2352-3018(18)30179-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Martin-Carbonero L, Palacios R, Valencia E, Saballs P, Sirera G, Santos I, et al. Long-term prognosis of HIV-infected patients with Kaposi sarcoma treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2008;47(3):410–7 doi 10.1086/589865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.