Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) plays an important role in mammals as a signaling molecule. Recently, abnormal H2S concentration has been associated with several pathophysiological states, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. As regulating H2S concentration can be a very prominent way of developing new drugs, many researchers have paid great attention to H2S research. To understand the role of H2S in pathophysiology and develop H2S-based therapies, it is necessary to measure the exact concentration of H2S within biological systems. But, H2S is volatile and can be easily oxidized. Besides, the active sites for several biological effects of H2S are inside the cell. Therefore, there is a need for the development of new methods for the accurate and reliable detection of H2S within live cells. This review provides a summary of recent developments in H2S detection methods for live cell analysis.
1. Introduction
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a biologically relevant gaseous signaling molecule, i.e., a gasotransmitter, collectively with nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) [1–3]. The endogenous production and signaling capability of H2S in mammalian tissues were firstly demonstrated by Abe and Kimura in 1996, showing that H2S is an endogenous modulator in the central nervous system [4]. Since then, there has been a dramatic shift from the belief that H2S works entirely as an environmental toxin to the understanding that H2S plays an important role in organ function and homeostasis [5]. H2S has been revealed to take part in the regulation of various pathophysiological conditions within mammalian systems, such as vascular tone and blood pressure [6, 7], neurotransmission [8], angiogenesis [9], cardiac function [10], various leukocytic functions [11], penile erectile function [12], and gastrointestinal tract function [13]. In general, when the concentration of H2S in tissues or cells is high, H2S is regarded as a toxic substance and its oxidation products—persulfide, sulfite, thiosulfate, and sulfate—may give rise to cytotoxic effects through inhibiting mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase and disrupting cell energy production, resulting in tissue inflammation or DNA damage [14]. On the other hand, H2S at low concentrations can lead to different effects on biological processes including DNA repair and metabolism, cellular division, regulation of cell cycle, modulation of protein kinase, and organization of cytoskeletal framework [15]. But the exact physiological role of H2S depends on the specific circumstance, its concentration, and the interplays with other signaling molecules—NO and CO.
Recently, there have been a few trials to classify the roles of H2S as “H2S–poor” and “H2S-rich” under pathophysiological conditions. First, there exist a few disease states where local or systemic H2S deficiency either due to inhibition of H2S biosynthesis and/or due to increased H2S consumption such as asthma, diabetic vascular complications, and aging [16]. Especially, H2S has been known to be associated to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases including hypertension [17], atherosclerosis [18], and myocardial injury [19], and the severity of these diseases is negatively related to plasma H2S levels [20, 21]. Besides, the mean serum H2S level in preeclampsia patients was significantly lower than controls [22]. And Renieris et al. suggested that H2S could be a potential marker for severity and final outcome of pneumonia by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus [23]. They showed that mortality was significantly greater among patients with a decrease of serum H2S levels (a cut-off point of 150.44 μM) from day 1 to day 7 greater than or equal to 36%. Second, in some diseases like various forms of critical illness and multiple forms of cancer, H2S biosynthesis is increased due to upregulation of H2S-synthesizing enzymes [16]. But, there is a lack of understanding of the ideal level of H2S in physiology and in therapy, as well as the normal concentration range of H2S in circulation. One of the main obstacles is the insufficiency of an accurate and efficient detection method of H2S for the screening and/or identification of possible H2S donors and inhibitors.
H2S is a colorless and flammable gas with the unique odor of rotten eggs [24]. As H2S is a highly lipophilic molecule, it can easily penetrate the plasma membrane of all cells without any specific transporter or receptor [25]. Acute exposure to high amounts (more than 500 ppm) of H2S can give rise to human death [14]. H2S is a weak acid and easily dissolved in water with a solubility of about 80 mmol/L at 37°C [26]. Generally, it can dissociate into H+ and hydrosulfide anion (HS−), which may subsequently dissociate to H+ and sulfide anion (S2−) in aqueous solution. Because the two acid dissociation constants, pKa1 and pKa2, of this reaction are 6.9 and >11, respectively, H2S is present in the approximate ratio of 20% H2S and 80% HS− at physiological pH [27, 28]. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether H2S, HS–, or both are biologically active. In addition to these free H2S such as H2S gas, HS−, and S2−, H2S can exist in other bound sulfide pools in the biological systems including the acid-labile, alkaline-labile, and reducible sulfur, which are different from the conditions under which free H2S is released [29, 30]. For example, acid-labile sulfide which is derived from iron-sulfur centers in mitochondrial enzymes [27] releases H2S under an acidic condition (pH < 5.0). And H2S is released from bound sulfane sulfur under reducing conditions including excess reduced glutathionine (GSH), L-cysteine (Cys), and dithiothreitol (DTT) [27]. These complicated chemical species make it difficult to accurately measure free H2S in biological systems. Actually, a lot of reports do not distinguish between the three most important biologic pools of labile sulfur: free H2S, acid-labile, and DTT-labile sulfide, which may have completely different biological functions [31]. In addition, the volatility of H2S adds complications to experiments [32]. For example, there are some published reports showing that half of H2S can be rapidly released from culture medium in tissue culture wells within 5 min and in an even shorter time in a bubbled tissue bath [33, 34]. This may have in part contributed to large variations on the reported level of H2S in plasma, tissues, and certain experiments [3, 35, 36].
During the past decade, several analytical methods such as methylene blue assay [37], gas chromatography [35], and sulfide-selective electrode [7] have been developed to detect H2S in biological tissues or fluids. Earlier studies using the methylene blue assay reported that the H2S level was 26–300 μM in mammalian plasma. However, later studies have shown that the high level of H2S may be attributed to the use of a strong acid in the methylene blue method [38, 39], because H2S can be released from acid-labile sulfur under a condition of a strong acid. Other methods have also been utilized to measure plasma H2S levels in the rat: sulfide-selective electrode showed approximately 50 μM, and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry showed approximately 80 μM [40]. As gas chromatography is evidently sensitive and specific, we think that it can be helpful for the detection of low physiological H2S levels. As a result, the large discrepancy among various reports may be attributed to the following reasons: (1) complications to experiments due to the intrinsic properties of H2S including the instability of sulfide, its high volatility, its great susceptibility to oxidation, and its adherence to various materials (for example, glass); (2) improper experimental conditions such as the wrong release of sulfide out of some rubbers used; (3) there were no distinction between free H2S, acid-labile, and DTT-labile sulfide; (4) different H2S levels according to age, tissue, and species; and (5) different measuring methods.
To understand biological roles of free H2S in health and disease state and develop H2S-based therapies, it is necessary to detect the exact concentration of free H2S within biological systems. As the active sites for various biological effects of H2S are inside the cell, the H2S level measured either in plasma or in homogenized tissue is not reflective of its cellular site of action [40]. To get more insight in their physiological roles, it is necessary to measure the H2S level released from cells. However, it is difficult to apply conventional methods, such as methylene blue assay, gas chromatography, and sulfide-selective electrode, to live cells owing to their destructive nature. Therefore, there had been a need for the development of novel methods for the accurate and reliable detection of endogenous free H2S within live cells.
Recently, a few studies regarding simple, facile, and inexpensive detection methods for the reliable detection of free H2S in live cells have been reported. In this review, we have focused on recent developments in H2S-sensing methods for live cells. We summarize the key characteristics of the analytical tools, cell types, experimental conditions for H2S production, and H2S concentration. In addition, the advantages and limitations of these methods are presented to provide a guideline for researchers to measure the H2S levels released from live cells.
2. Spectrophotometric Methods for Live Cell Analysis
Among all the reaction-based spectrophotometric methods, the methylene blue method is the traditional standard. This method was introduced by Fischer in 1883 [41] and has been utilized for H2S determination in many studies. As H2S is very volatile and can be easily oxidized, sample preparation using Zn2+ is generally required for the stabilization of H2S. In this method, the acidic condition is generally employed to liberate H2S from zinc sulfide complex. Subsequently, H2S reacts with N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylene diamine (N,N-dpd) in the presence of an oxidizing agent (usually FeCl3), producing methylene blue that strongly absorbs at 670 nm [42]. The absorbance is proportional to sulfide concentration. This method has been approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a standard method for sulfide quantization [42]. But the use of toxic and corrosive agents was the main limiting factor in terms of disturbing the application of this method to live cells.
Kartha et al. [43] reported enhanced detection of H2S generated in cell culture using an agar trap method (in situ methylene blue assay). As shown in Figure 1, they cultured the cells in 50 mL cell culture flasks that had a preset layer of zinc-agar on the nonadherent surface inside each flask. The H2S produced following incubation of the cell culture with H2S-releasing compounds was trapped as zinc sulfide in the zinc-agar layer. At the end of the incubation, media were carefully eliminated from the flasks without disturbing the agar layer. Then, the flasks were orientated with the agar layer, and H2S trapped in the agar as zinc sulfide was released and analyzed in situ utilizing a modified methylene blue reaction. This method was used to determine the activity of H2S-generating enzymes in intact cells, following a 24 h incubation of human endothelial-like immortalized cells Ea.hy 926 or rat vascular smooth muscle cells A10 with 1000, 3000, and 5000 μM Cys. As a result, A10 cells showed about twice the activity of H2S-generating enzymes, compared to Ea.hy 926 cells. The authors suggested that H2S-generating enzymes showed different activity depending on the cell type.
Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of the experimental setup for H2S trapping method in (a) cell culture system and (b) in situ methylene blue assay. (c) Comparison of amount of H2S generated from Ea.hy 926 (checkered bars) and A10 (dotted bars) cells. Cells were treated with 1000, 3000, and 5000 μM L-cysteine for 24 h. Reprinted from [43] with permission from publisher.
The modified methylene blue-based method is inexpensive, nondestructive, adaptable to most lab settings, and more convenient than conventional methylene blue method. But the method still requires several complex steps including medium elimination, H2S release, and analysis of methylene blue. In addition, this method is also vulnerable to interference with colored substances, lowering its sensitivity.
Fu and Duan [44] reported a sensitive and selective method for H2S detection based on in situ formation of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on the Ag2S NP surface (Ag2S@Ag) in a layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte multilayer film using Ag amplification. The UV absorption at 430 nm showed a good linear relationship with the concentration of Na2S ranging from 10 nM to 5 mM. They measured free H2S gas generated from live liver cancer cell line HepG2 cells after treatment with Cys and pyridoxal phosphate (PLP). Although this method is sensitive and shows a wide linear range for H2S, it is necessary to long extra reaction time (2 h) for Ag amplification.
Ahn et al. [45] suggested a simple and cost-effective colorimetric system for selective H2S detection in live cells utilizing a Ag-embedded Nafion/PVP membrane applied onto a polystyrene microplate cover. The basic principle of H2S gas detection is the reaction between Ag and sulfide to form brown-colored Ag2S. A schematic illustration of the colorimetric assay is shown in Figure 2. This assay detected H2S release in live C6 glioma cells under stimulation of S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), thus confirming the activating effect of SAM and two substrates, Cys and homocysteine (hCys), on the pathway of cystathionine β-synthase- (CBS-) dependent H2S production [45]. Consequently, SAM-stimulated H2S release (10.82 ± 1.66 μM) in C6 glioma cells treated with both Cys and hCys was higher compared with the H2S production by Cys alone (8.27 ± 0.83 μM, p < 0.05) or without Cys and hCys (1.16 ± 0.80 μM, p < 0.001) (Figure 2). The results were similar to the Western blot analysis of CBS expression. Using this microplate cover-based colorimetric assay, Kim et al. [46] analyzed the H2S-releasing properties of seven different H2S donors, including sodium sulfide (Na2S), NaHS, diallyl disulfide, diallyl trisulfide, sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3), morpholin-4-ium 4-methoxyphenyl-morpholino-phosphinodithioate (GYY4137), and Lawesson's reagent. Besides, Youness et al. [47] utilized this assay to measure the H2S levels released from MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 after silencing of CBS and cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE).
Figure 2.

(a) Schematic illustration of microplate cover-based colorimetric assay utilizing the Ag/Nafion/PVP membrane. (b) The concentration of endogenous H2S production in live C6 glioma cells after treatment with s-(5′-adenosyl)-L-methionine (SAM, 2.5 mM), L-cysteine (Cys, 10 mM), and L-homocysteine (hCys, 0.5 mM) treatment in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Reprinted from [45] with permission from publisher.
Although this method was the first report on the measurement of free H2S release in live cells utilizing the simple colorimetric method, the concentrations of SAM, Cys, and hCys used in this study were not physiological. But, this assay may be more helpful to explore the potential for Cys analogs and prodrugs to promote cytoprotection through the H2S pathway.
Zeng et al. [48] developed a colorimetric method for detection of H2S using gold (Au)/AgI dimeric NPs as optical probes. When Au/AgI NPs were reacted with H2S, AgI was changed to Ag2S, causing a shift in the plasmonic band of the AuNPs. The color and absorption changes were observed by naked eyes or measured by UV–vis spectroscopy (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). In addition, the Au/AgI NPs were immobilized in agarose gels as test strips. These agarose gels were placed on the inner surface of the culture plate cover and then used for HepG2 cell culture. As a result, the H2S concentration was calculated as 167 nmol h−1 · 10−6 cells after treatment with Cys (2 mM) and PLP (0.5 mM) for 24 h (Figure 3(c)).
Figure 3.

(a) The sensing principle of Au/AgI dimeric nanoparticle-based colorimetric assay for detection of H2S. Photographic images of agarose gels incubated (b) with different concentrations of S2- from 0 to 60 μM and (c) from cell culture for 0, 8, 16, and 24 h. Reprinted from [48] with permission from publisher.
3. Fluorescence Detection and Imaging for Live Cell Analysis
Recently, small-molecule fluorescent probes have been attracted attention as an effective tool for detection and imaging of H2S in biological specimens such as tissues or cells due to their nondestructive property. The H2S-responsive fluorescent probes are mainly divided into four different categories depending upon their reaction types such as azide-to-amine reduction, nitro-to-amine reduction, copper sulfide precipitation, and nucleophilic addition [49, 50]. Early work in this field utilized the selective H2S-mediated reduction of azides and sulfonylazides, respectively, to develop first-generation reagents for fluorescence H2S detection [51]. Since then, Lin et al. [52] reported a family of azide-based fluorescent H2S indicators which had enhanced sensitivity and cellular trappability. In particular, sulfidefluor-7 acetoxymethyl ester enabled direct and real-time visualization of endogenous H2S release in live human umbilical vein endothelial cells under stimulation with vascular endothelial growth factor. And Yang et al. [50] developed a red-emitting fluorescent probe for H2S using the reduction of the azido group. This probe represented a striking fluorescence enhancement (10-fold) with a large Stokes shift (125 nm), and the detection limit was 5.7 nM. They detected exogenous and endogenous H2S in live HeLa cells.
Furthermore, Cheng et al. [53] developed a probe for the fluorescence switch-on detection of H2S, by employing dinitrophenyl ether functionality as both a fluorescence quencher and an H2S-reaction trigger. It was easily synthesized via nucleophilic substitution of 3,4-dinitrofluorobenzene by the BODIPY fluorophore 1. Its ability to image H2S in live cells was demonstrated using HeLa cells and NaHS as the H2S source. For specific and sensitive imaging of H2S in the cellular lysosome, Wu et al. [54] developed activable fluorescence nanoprobe-based quantum dots. This nanoprobe consisted of p-amino thiophenol-capped AgNPs and thioglycolic-acid-stabilized quantum dots, called QD/AgNP nanocomplexes. The detection limit of this nanoprobe was 15 nM. And they showed high ability to enter into cellular lysosome in live HeLa cells.
Compared with “turn-on” fluorescent probes, ratiometric fluorescent probes have been proposed to be more accurate for detecting H2S, independently of variables in quantitative analysis including variations of excitation intensity, environmental factors, light scattering, and concentration of probe [55]. An et al. [56] reported the quinoline quaternary ammonium salt derivative-based ratiometric fluorescent probe (referred to as QL-N3). The QL-N3 probe exhibited two fluorescence emission peaks at 525 and 605 nm with different excitation wavelengths of 385 and 521 nm, and the ratio between fluorescence intensities of two peaks was positively related with the H2S concentration. This probe could image the changes in exogenous and endogenous H2S in live HeLa cells.
Nevertheless, there are still several challenging issues in the development of fluorescent probes for H2S as follows: (i) selectivity over interfering biothiols including GSH, Cys, and hCys; (ii) high sensitivity enough to detect the endogenously produced H2S; (iii) fast response within a few minutes; (iv) biocompatibility including low toxicity, cell permeability, and intracellular stability; and (v) signaling in the biological optical window. Recently, Singha et al. [57] reported a two-photon fluorescent probe for H2S which belonged to a Michael acceptor system. They approached the selectivity issue by optimizing the electronic and steric interactions between biothiols and the probe, in addition to gaining very high sensitivity, biocompatibility, and fast response time.
Fluorescence-based detection provides excellent sensitivity, high selectivity, and real-time H2S monitoring not only within living cells but also within subcellular organelles. Therefore, the progress of H2S-specific fluorescence probes is regarded one of the fastest-growing areas in the field of H2S biology [58]. Although fluorescence-based detection has attracted immense attention for detecting H2S inside living cells, it is essential to use expensive instruments and special H2S probes for live cell fluorescence detection. So, it may be difficult to utilize this method in many labs.
4. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering for Live Cell Analysis
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a promising ultrasensitive spectral analysis technique because of its high selectivity, based on molecular fingerprinting and sensitivity, even at single-molecule detection levels [59–61]. With strong electromagnetic fields and surface chemistry enhancements, SERS can increase the original Raman signal to 106 orders or more [62]. Recently, the SERS sensors have been utilized for the analysis of a variety of substances including DNA, protein, metal ions, and pesticides [63–65].
Li et al. [66] reported a novel SERS nanosensor fabricated by functionalizing AuNPs with 4-acetamidobenzenesulfonyl azide (AuNPs/4-AA) for detecting the endogenous H2S in live cells (Figure 4(a)). The detection was performed with SERS spectrum changes in AuNPs/4-AA coming from the reaction of H2S with 4-AA on AuNPs (transformation of the azide groups of 4-AA into amino groups). AuNPs/4-AA responded to H2S within 1 min with a 0.1 μM level of sensitivity. Using SERS nanosensor, the H2S concentration in living glioma cells was found to have approximately 10-fold increase after 2 h stimulation of SAM, confirming that SAM can activate CBS to improve its catalytic ability to produce H2S. Besides, the viability of glioma cells after the addition of AuNPs/4-AA was higher than 88% at the concentration ranging from 1 to 10 nM, showing the good biocompatibility of AuNPs/4-AA (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)).
Figure 4.

(a) Sensing mechanism of SERS nanosensors for detection of endogenous H2S in living cells. (b) Bright-field microscopy (A1) and dark-field microscopy (B1) images of rat C6 glioma cells after 4 h incubation with AuNPs/4-AA. (c) Cytotoxicity of different concentrations of AuNPs/4-AA in the presence and absence of NaHS after incubation of 48 h. Reprinted from [66] with permission from publisher.
And Zhang et al. [67] proposed a smart SERS nanoprobe, Au core-4-mercaptobenzonitrile-Ag shell NP (Au@4-MBN@Ag), for detection of endogenous H2S in live HepG2 cells. As sulfide in the solution selectively reacted with Ag to transform Ag2S at room temperature, the SERS intensity of 4-MBN gradually decreased with increasing concentration of H2S. It showed a good linearity in the sulfide concentration ranging from 0.05 to 500 μM, and a detection limit was 0.14 nM.
Though SERS has important advantages over fluorescence-based methods, such as resistance to photobleaching and phototoxicity, and narrow emission peaks for spectral multiplexing, it is still necessitated to develop H2S-specific SERS probes due to the difficulty in direct sensing of inorganic species. In addition, SERS require expensive instrument—Raman spectrophotometer.
5. Paper-Based Colorimetric Assay for Live Cell Analysis
Paper-based sensors have received great attention in the development of point-of-care (POC) diagnostics owing to the simple fabrication, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendly characteristics. The distinct properties of paper which enable passive liquid transport and compatibility with chemicals or biochemicals are the main reasons on which paper is utilized as a sensing platform [68]. In addition, the white paper is suitable for colorimetric detection because it gives strong contrast with a colored substrate [69]. So, it enables readers to check the results with the naked eye.
Rosolina et al. [70] reported a bismuth-based disposable sensor using a wet, porous, and paper-like substrate coated with alkaline bismuth hydroxide, Bi(OH)3. The alkaline, wet coating helped the trapping of acidic H2S gas and its reaction with Bi(III) species, forming colored Bi2S3 (yellow/brown). This sensor responded to ≥30 ppb H2S in a total volume of 1.35 L of gas. However, its alkalinity (pH 11) required special care in handling. And this sensor should be kept inside an inert gas to prevent neutralization by acidic CO2 in air. Carpenter et al. [71] reported a new probe using the copper(II) complex of 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (Cu-PAN) on the same paper-like substrate. The reaction between H2S gas and the copper complex led to a striking change in color from purple to yellow/orange. This color change was visible to the naked eye at the concentration as low as 30 ppb H2S in a 1.35 L of gas which was considered as a typical volume of human breath. They suggested that the colorimetric paper probe is easy to fabricate, cost-effective, disposable, and a green alternative to the commonly used lead acetate test papers. Recently, Ahn et al. [72] developed a rapid and simple colorimetric paper sensor using an etching-resistant effect on Ag nanoprisms. The detection principle was that Ag NPRs on the paper reacted with H2S gas to form Ag2S on their surfaces, which induced etching-resistant Ag NPRs against Cl− ions. As a result, the color of Ag NPR-coated paper varied from yellow to purplish brown, depending on the concentration of H2S gas after KCl treatment. This H2S-sensing paper showed good sensitivity with a linear range of 1.03 to 32.9 μM H2S and a fast response time of 1 min. The authors suggested that it could be utilized as a simple and reliable tool for on-site detection of H2S gas for quality check of dietary supplements and human breath analysis. However, the H2S-sensing papers mentioned above were not confirmed whether they worked properly at cell culture environment or in live cells.
Lee et al. [73] reported a new paper-based colorimetric assay by fabricating a 96-well microplate format for cell culture for sensing H2S gas in live cancer cells. Microplate-like hydrophobic walls designed using AutoCAD were printed using a Xerox ColorQube 8570 N printer. Wax-printed paper (Whatman grade 1 chromatography paper) consisted of 96 circular reservoirs with a 4 mm detection zone. A PVP membrane containing Ag/Nafion was coated on the H2S detection zones. Finally, this paper-based colorimetric assay successfully measured the difference in endogenous H2S level between live prostate cancer LNCaP and PC-3 cells, which showed differential expression of H2S-producing enzymes. Though this paper-based assay was simple, inexpensive, and feasible, it could not measure the low concentration of H2S released from LNCaP cells within 24 h.
6. Dual-Mode Detection for Live Cell Analysis
Although colorimetry-based sensing method is a simple and rapid technique for POC diagnostics and high-speed bioanalysis, the detection limit or sensitivity may be disappointing [74]. The low sensitivity can somewhat restrict the application of colorimetric methods for quantitative analysis of endogenous H2S in live cells under shorter time. A dual-mode detection based on colorimetry and other sensing methods such as SERS, fluorescence, or wettability can improve the sensitivity of conventional colorimetric sensors, because they give two different types of output signals covering a wider detection range [75]. Gahlaut et al. [76] introduced a dual-mode H2S detection combined colorimetric principle and wettability of Ag nanorod arrays on glass substrates. The surface color and water wetting properties of nanorods were found to be highly sensitive toward the H2S gas environment (5 ppm of gas with an exposure time of only 30 s). Together with high sensitivity and selectivity, the response time was found to be significantly low (within 5 s). The authors suggested that this method could be applied for the future study of H2S release from biosystems (live cells), as well as art conservation.
Zhong et al. [77] reported a colorimetric and near-infrared fluorescent probe (L) with a donor-π-acceptor structure derived from 4-diethylaminosalicylaldehyde and 2-(3-cyano-4,5,5-trimethylfuran-2(5H)-ylidene)malononitrile. A distinct color change of L solution from colorless to bluish-purple took place after treatment with H2S. Using this probe, they detected H2S vapor, H2S in water and wine samples, and H2S imaging in live MCF-7 cells. Besides, Paul et al. [78] reported a colorimetric and fluorescence turn-off probe 10-(4-azido phenyl)-5,5-difluoro-5h-dipyrrolo[1,2-c:1′,2′-f] [1–3] diazaborinin-4-ium-5-uide, 1, for selective detection of H2S. The detection limit of this probe was 0.17 μM for H2S. They successfully detected exogenous H2S in live normal human oral fibroblast (NHOF) cells.
In addition, Ahn et al. [79] suggested a colorimetric and SERS-sensing system using Ag nanoplates on the paper. This dual-mode system could be helpful for detection of low concentrations of H2S in live cells because SERS could greatly improve the detection limit (Figure 5(a)). As a result, this simple paper assay could measure H2S with wider ranging from nano- to micromolar levels. And it was able to measure endogenous H2S in live LNCaP cells even at 8 h of incubation after cotreatment with Cys (5 mM) and hCys (1 mM) (Figure 5(b)). Besides, the viability of LNCaP cells was greater than 90% for 48 h, indicating good cell proliferation of live cells (Figure 5(c)).
Figure 5.

(a) Schematics of the preparation of Ag nanoplate-based H2S-sensing paper and its principle of colorimetric and SERS dual-mode detection of H2S. (b) The concentration of endogenous H2S release from live LNCaP cells, varying with incubation times. (c) Evaluation of cellular toxicity of 5 mM L-cysteine (Cys) and 1 mM homocysteine (hCys) cotreatment in LNCaP cells. After incubation for 24 and 48 h, cellular toxicity was measured using water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST) assay and expressed as a percentage of the control without Cys or hCys. Reprinted from [79] with permission from publisher.
Liu et al. [80] reported a ruthenium (Ru) (II) complex-based probe for colorimetric and luminescent detection and imaging of H2S in live cells and organisms. This Ru(II) complex was yellow color and nonluminescent in aqueous solution. But, when it reacted with H2S, the color of the solution changed from yellow to pink for colorimetric analysis and the emission intensity was about 65-fold increased for luminescent analysis. As this probe had low cytotoxicity and good permeability to cell membrane, it could be utilized for luminescence imaging of H2S in live HeLa cells.
Until now, we described the recent developments in H2S detection methods for live cell analysis. Table 1 summarized some characteristics, H2S levels, advantages, and limitations of recently reported methods for the detection of free H2S from live cells. And Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show a schematic diagram of the H2S detection process in live cells without causing any destruction to the cells and a comparison plot of sensitivity versus accessibility of various analytical methods, respectively.
Table 1.
Some characteristics and H2S levels of recently reported methods for the detection of free H2S in live cells.
| Analytical methods for H2S | Cell types | Experimental conditions forH2S production | H2S concentration | Advantages & limitations | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrophotometric method | In situ methylene blue assay | Rat A10 cells | 24 h incubation with 1, 3, and 5 mM of Cys and 1, 2, and 5 mM NAC | 40.67 ± 4.8 μM (with 3 mM Cys) 51.5 ± 7.5 μM (with 2 mM NAC) |
(Adv.) cost-effective & adaptable to most lab. settings (Limit.) low sensitivity, several complex steps & interferences with colored substances |
[43] |
| Ag2S@AgNPs in a layer-by-layer film | HepG2 cells | 2 h incubation with Cys and PLP (+Ag amplification for 2 h) | — | (Adv.) high sensitivity (10 nM) (Limit.) additional amplification time (2 h), except for the reaction time (2 h) |
[44] | |
| Ag-embedded Nafion/PVP membrane | Rat C6 glioma cells | SAM treatment and with a combination of Cys (10 mM) and hCys (0.5 mM) for 48 h | 10.82 ± 1.66 μM | (Adv.) simple, facile, cost-effective, & adaptable to most lab. settings (Limit.) low sensitivity & treatment with high levels of substrates |
[45] | |
| Au/AgI dimeric NPs | HepG2 cells | 24 h incubation with 2 mM of Cys and 0.5 mM PLP | 167 nmol h−1 · 10−6 cells | (Adv.) good sensitivity (500 nM) (Limit.) long response time |
[48] | |
|
| ||||||
| Fluorescence detection and imaging | Reduction of the azido group (λem = 610 nm) | HeLa cells | Prestimulation with 100 μM of SNP (NO donor) for 60 min | — | (Adv.) high sensitivity (LOD 5.7 nM) (Limit.) only fluorescence cell imaging & long response time |
[50] |
| Reduction of azide to amine (λem = 526 nm) | HUVECs | Stimulation with VEGF (40 ng/mL) for 30 min | Intracellular fluorescence ratio 1Ff/Fi ≈ 1.27 (vs. 1.07 of control) |
(Adv.) good sensitivity (LOD 500 nM) (Limit.) long response time |
[52] | |
| Nucleophilic cleavage of the ether bond (λem = 570 nm) | HeLa cells | 1 h incubation with NaHS (100, 200, and 300 μM) | — | (Adv.) good sensitivity (LOD 500 nM) (Limit.) only fluorescence imaging & long response time |
[53] | |
| H2S-triggered disassembly of QDs/AgNP complexes (λem = 530 nm) | HeLa cells | Pretreatment with 300 μM NaHS for 30 min | — | (Adv.) high sensitivity (LOD 15 nM) (Limit.) only fluorescence imaging & long response time |
[54] | |
| Reduction of azide to amino group | HeLa cells | 60 min incubation with Na2S (100 μM) | The fluorescence intensity (red, 605 nm)/blue, 525 nm) ratio 2.416 (vs. 1.498 of untreated cells) | (Adv.) enhanced detection accuracy (ratiometric analysis) (Limit.) long response time |
[56] | |
|
| ||||||
| Surface-enhanced Raman scattering | Rat C6 glioma cells & human U251 MG glioma cells | SAM stimulation | Ratiometric Raman peak intensity I709/I1161: about 10-fold increase after 2 h stimulation of SAM | (Adv.) good sensitivity (LOD 0.1 μM) & fast response time (1 min) (Limit.) needs specific SERS probe and expensive instrument |
[66] | |
|
| ||||||
| Paper-based colorimetric assay | LNCap cells | 72 h incubation with 5 mM of Cys and 1 mM hCys | 17.48 ± 3.80 μM (72 h) |
(Adv.) simple, low-cost, practical, & moderate sensitivity (LOD 1.4 μM) (Limit.) treatment with high levels of substrates |
[73] | |
|
| ||||||
| Dual-mode detection | Colorimetry & near-IR fluorescence | MCF-7 cells | 30 min incubation with NaHS (10, 50, and 100 μM) | — | (Adv.) moderate sensitivity (LOD 3.09 μM) & fluorescence “off-on” response (Limit.) only fluorescence imaging |
[77] |
| Colorimetry & fluorescence | NHOF cells | 0, 20, and 60 min incubation with NaHS (10 μM) | — | (Adv.) good sensitivity (LOD 0.17 μM) (Limit.) only fluorescence imaging |
[78] | |
| Colorimetry & SERS | LNCap cells | Cys (5 mM) and hCys (1 mM) treatment for 8, 16, and 24 h | 0.144 ± 0.007 μM (8 h) 0.211 ± 0.007 μM (16 h) 2.45 ± 0.26 μM (24 h) |
(Adv.) high sensitivity (LOD 15 nM for SERS detection & LOD 520 nM for colorimetry) (Limit.) treatment with substrates |
[79] | |
| Colorimetry & luminescence | HeLa cells | 30 min incubation with H2S (200 μM) | — | (Adv.) high sensitivity (LOD 53.9 nM) (Limit.) only luminescence imaging |
[80] | |
1Fi: initial mean fluorescence intensity; Ff: final mean fluorescence intensity. Cys: L-cysteine; NAC: N-acetylcysteine; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; SNP: sodium nitroprusside; HUVEC: human umbilical vein endothelial cells; SAM: s-adenosyl methionine; hCys: homocysteine. PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone; QDs: quantum dots; AgNP: silver nanoparticle; PLP: pyridoxal phosphate; A10: vascular smooth muscle cell; NHOF: normal human oral fibroblast.
Figure 6.

(a) Schematic diagram of the H2S detection process in live cells. (b) Comparison plot of sensitivity versus accessibility & usability of various analytical methods for detection of H2S in live cells.
7. Conclusions
In this review, we have summarized the methods for the detection of H2S in live cells without causing any destruction to the cells. To measure H2S level in conventional biology, an indirect method that analyzes the expression of H2S synthase, such as CBS and CSE, in cell lysate or tissue homogenate using Western blot analysis is widely used. But the total analysis time for the Western blot from cell seeding is approximately 7 days including all the necessary processes such as treatment of substrates and cell lysis. To eliminate or reduce the complicated and labor-intensive analytical approach, several methods that are simple, efficient, and reliable for detection of H2S in live cells have been developed.
Microplate cover-based and paper-based colorimetric assays utilizing Ag/Nafion/PVP membrane can quantitatively analyze the endogenous H2S levels in live cancer cells, without expensive instruments and special H2S probes. Although these colorimetric assays are simple, easy to use, and cost-effective, they still have the limitation of low sensitivity. Recent developments in fluorescent probes for reactive sulfur species can further facilitate analysis based on fluorescence bioimaging technology. But, there are still challenging issues including high sensitivity and selectivity in the presence of many interfering biomolecules, water solubility, and low cytotoxicity. And SERS detection using H2S-responsive SERS probe shows great promise for the real-time monitoring of H2S produced in live cells, though it requires a Raman spectrophotometer. The dual-mode detection based on colorimetry and other detection methods such as SERS or fluorescence can improve the sensing performance such as high sensitivity and wide detection range, as well as easy to use. And further work for developing the highly sensitive, specific, biocompatible, and reproducible detection method is required to measure free H2S in live cells in the absence of additional substrates or stimulator.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: KMDF_PR_20200901_0023, 1711137928).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- 1.Szabo C. Hydrogen sulphide and its therapeutic potential. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2007;6(11):917–935. doi: 10.1038/nrd2425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xiao Q., Ying J., Xiang L., Zhang C. The biologic effect of hydrogen sulfide and its function in various diseases. Medicine. 2018;97(44, article e13065) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cao X., Ding L., Xie Z., et al. A review of hydrogen sulfide synthesis, metabolism, and measurement: is modulation of hydrogen sulfide a novel therapeutic for Cancer? Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2019;31(1):1–38. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abe K., Kimura H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator. Journal of Neuroscience. 1996;16(3):1066–1071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01066.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li Z., Polhemus D. J., Lefer D. J. Evolution of hydrogen sulfide therapeutics to treat cardiovascular disease. Circulation Research. 2018;123(5):590–600. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhao W., Zhang J., Lu Y., Wang R. The vasorelaxant effect of H2S as a novel endogenous gaseous K(ATP) channel opener. EMBO Journal. 2001;20(21):6008–6016. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.21.6008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang G., Wu L., Jiang B., et al. H2S as a physiologic vasorelaxant: hypertension in mice with deletion of Cystathionine-Lyase. Science. 2008;322(5901):587–590. doi: 10.1126/science.1162667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang X., Bian J. S. Hydrogen sulfide: a neuromodulator and neuroprotectant in the central nervous system. ACS Chemcal Neuroscience. 2014;5(10):876–883. doi: 10.1021/cn500185g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Szabo C. Hydrogen sulfide, an enhancer of vascular nitric oxide signaling: mechanisms and implications. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology. 2017;312(1):C3–C15. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00282.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Polhemus D. K., Lefer D. J. Emergence of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous gaseous signaling molecule in cardiovascular disease. Circulation Research. 2014;114(4):730–737. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.300505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wallace J. L., Caliendo G., Santagada V., Cirino G. Markedly reduced toxicity of a hydrogen sulphide-releasing derivative of naproxen (ATB-346) British Journal of Pharmacology. 2010;159(6):1236–1246. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00611.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.di Villa Bianca Rd, Cirino G., Sorrentino R. Hydrogen sulfide and urogenital tract. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology. 2015;230:111–136. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18144-8_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Voloshchuk N., Taran I., Pashynska O., Melnyk A., Magdebura S. The role of hydrogen sulfide in gastrointestinal tract functioning (review) Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences. 2020;33(1):45–50. doi: 10.2478/cipms-2020-0009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reiffenstein R. J., Hulbert W. C., Roth S. H. Toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. Annual Reviews of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 1992;32(1):109–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.000545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Szabo C. A timeline of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) research: from environmental toxin to biological mediator. Biochemcal Pharmacology. 2018;149:5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Szabo C., Papapetropoulos A. International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. CII: pharmacological modulation of H2S levels: H2S donors and H2S biosynthesis inhibitors. Pharmacological Reviews. 2017;69(4):497–564. doi: 10.1124/pr.117.014050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun N. L., Xi Y., Yang S. N., Ma Z., Tang C. S. Plasma hydrogen sulfide and homocysteine levels in hypertensive patients with different blood pressure levels and complications. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007;35(12):1145–1148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laggner H., Muellner M. K., Schreier S., et al. Hydrogen sulphide: a novel physiological inhibitor of LDL atherogenic modification by HOCl. Free Radical Research. 2007;41(7):741–747. doi: 10.1080/10715760701263265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nicholson C. K., Calvert J. W. Hydrogen sulfide and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Pharmacological Research. 2010;62(4):289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Koning A. M., Meijers W. C., Minović I., et al. The fate of sulfate in chronic heart failure. Americal Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2017;312(3):H415–H421. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00645.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu L., Li W., Park B. M., Lee G. J., Kim S. H. Hypoxia augments NaHS-induced ANP secretion via KATP channel, HIF-1α and PPAR-γ pathway. Peptides. 2019;121, article 170123 doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chaudhuri S., Biswas U., Kumar A. Association of serum hydrogen sulphide with hypertension and proteinuria in pre-eclampsia. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019;10(6):33–38. doi: 10.3126/ajms.v10i6.25962. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Renieris G., Katrini K., Damoulari C., et al. Serum hydrogen sulfide and outcome association in pneumonia by the SARS-COV-2 coronavirus. Shock. 2020;54(5):633–637. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wen Y. D., Wang H., Zhu Y. Z. The drug developments of hydrogen sulfide on cardiovascular disease. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2018;2018:21. doi: 10.1155/2018/4010395.4010395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mathai J. C., Missner A., Kugler P., et al. No facilitator required for membrane transport of hydrogen sulfide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(39):16633–16638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902952106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kabil O., Banerjee R. Redox Biochemistry of Hydrogen Sulfide. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(29):21903–21907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.128363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Olson K. R. Is hydrogen sulfide a circulating "gasotransmitter" in vertebrate blood? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Bioenergetics. 2009;1787(7):856–863. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kimura H. Hydrogen sulfide and polysulfides as biological mediators. Molecules. 2014;19(10):16146–16157. doi: 10.3390/molecules191016146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nagy P., Pálinkás Z., Nagy A., Budai B., Tóth I., Vasas A. Chemical aspects of hydrogen sulfide measurements in physiological samples. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – General Subjects. 2014;1840(2):876–891. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tan B., Jin S., Sun J., et al. New method for quantification of gasotransmitter hydrogen sulfide in biological matrices by LC-MS/MS. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1, article 46278) doi: 10.1038/srep46278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tangerman A. Measurement and biological significance of the volatile sulfur compounds hydrogen sulfide, methanethiol and dimethyl sulfide in various biological matrices. Journal of Chromatography B Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences. 2009;877(28):3366–3377. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zheng Y., Ji X., Ji K., Wang B. Hydrogen sulfide prodrugs--a review. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2015;5(5):367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.DeLeon E. R., Stoy G. F., Olson K. R. Passive loss of hydrogen sulfide in biological experiments. Analytical Biochemistry. 2012;421(1):203–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Oh G. S., Pae H. O., Lee B. S., et al. Hydrogen sulfide inhibits nitric oxide production and nuclear factor-κB via heme oxygenase-1 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2006;41(1):106–119. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Furne J., Saeed A., Levitt M. D. Whole tissue hydrogen sulfide concentrations are orders of magnitude lower than presently accepted values. American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2008;295(5):R1479–R1485. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90566.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shen X., Pattillo C. B., Pardue S., Bir S. C., Wang R., Kevil C. G. Measurement of plasma hydrogen sulfide in vivo and in vitro. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2011;50(9):1021–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wallace J. L., Vong L., McKnight W., Dicay M., Martin G. R. Endogenous and exogenous hydrogen sulfide promotes resolution of colitis in rats. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):569–578.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Whitfield N. L., Kreimier E. L., Verdial F. C., Skovgaard N., Olson K. R. Reappraisal of H2S/sulfide concentration in vertebrate blood and its potential significance in ischemic preconditioning and vascular signaling. American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2008;294(6):R1930–R1937. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00025.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ishigami M., Hiraki K., Umemura K., Ogasawara Y., Ishii K., Kimura H. A source of hydrogen sulfide and a mechanism of its release in the brain. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2009;11(2):205–214. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li L., Rose P., Moore P. K. Hydrogen sulfide and cell signaling. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2011;51(1):169–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fischer E. Bildung von methylenblau als reaction auf schwefelwasserstoff. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 1883;16(2):2234–2236. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li Z. G. Quantification of hydrogen sulfide concentration using methylene blue and 5,5’-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) methods in plants. In: Cadenas E., Packer L., editors. Hydrogen sulfide in redox biology, Part A, Methods Enzymol. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier; 2015. pp. 101–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kartha R. V., Zhou J., Hovde L. B., Cheung B. W. Y., Schröder H. Enhanced detection of hydrogen sulfide generated in cell culture using an agar trap method. Analytical Biochemistry. 2012;423(1):102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fu H., Duan X. Highly sensitive and colorimetric detection of hydrogen sulphide by in situ formation of Ag2S@Ag nanoparticles in polyelectrolyte multilayer film. RSC Advances. 2014;5:3508–3511. doi: 10.1039/c4ra11526k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ahn Y. J., Lee Y. J., Lee J., Lee D., Park H. K., Lee G. J. Colorimetric detection of endogenous hydrogen sulfide production in living cells. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2017;177:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kim T. J., Lee Y. J., Ahn Y. J., Lee G. J. Characterization of H2S releasing properties of various H2S donors utilizing microplate cover-based colorimetric assay. Analytical Biochemistry. 2019;574(1):57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Youness R. A., Gad A. Z., Sanber K., et al. Targeting hydrogen sulphide signaling in breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Research. 2021;27:177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zeng J., Li M., Liu A., et al. Colorimetric Sulfide Sensing: Au/AgI dimeric nanoparticles for highly selective and sensitive colorimetric detection of hydrogen sulfide (Adv. Funct. Mater. 26/2018) Advanced Functional Materials. 2018;28(26, article 1870176) doi: 10.1002/adfm.201870176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yu F., Han X., Chen L. Fluorescent probes for hydrogen sulfide detection and bioimaging. Chemical Communications. 2014;50(82):12234–12249. doi: 10.1039/C4CC03312D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yang L., Su Y., Sha Z., Geng Y., Qi F., Song X. A red-emitting fluorescent probe for hydrogen sulfide in living cells with a large Stokes shift. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2018;16(7):1150–1156. doi: 10.1039/C7OB02641B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Peng H., Cheng Y., Dai C., et al. A fluorescent probe for fast and quantitative detection of hydrogen sulfide in blood. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) 2011;50(41):9672–9675. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lin V. S., Lippert A. R., Chang C. J. Cell-trappable fluorescent probes for endogenous hydrogen sulfide signaling and imaging H2O2-dependent H2S production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(18):7131–7135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302193110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cheng J., Shao B., Zhang S., Hu Y., Li X. Selective and sensitive detection of hydrogen sulfide in live cells. RSC Advances. 2015;5(80):65203–65207. doi: 10.1039/C5RA11590F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wu Y., Wang Q., Wu T., et al. Detection and imaging of hydrogen sulfide in lysosomes of living cells with activatable fluorescent quantum dots. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018;10(50):43472–43481. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang L., Meng W., Lu L., et al. Selective detection of endogenous H2S in living cells and the mouse hippocampus using a ratiometric fluorescent probe. Scientific Reports. 2015;4:p. 5870. doi: 10.1038/srep05870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.An B., Zhang H., Peng J., Zhu W., Wei N., Zhang Y. A highly sensitive ratiometric fluorescent probe for imaging endogenous hydrogen sulfide in cells. New Journal of Chemistry. 2020;44(46):20253–20258. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ04786D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Singha S., Kim D., Moon H., et al. Toward a selective, sensitive, fast-responsive, and biocompatible two-photon probe for hydrogen sulfide in live cells. Analytical Chemistry. 2015;87(2):1188–1195. doi: 10.1021/ac503806w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ibrahim H., Serag A., Farag M. A. Emerging analytical tools for the detection of the third gasotransmitter H2S, a comprehensive review. Journal of Advanced Research. 2021;27:137–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gao X., Zhang H., Fan X., et al. Toward the highly sensitive SERS detection of bio-molecules: the formation of a 3D self-assembled structure with a uniform GO mesh between Ag nanoparticles and Au nanoparticles. Optics Express. 2019;27(18):25091–25106. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.025091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee M., Oh K., Choi H. K., et al. Subnanomolar sensitivity of filter paper-based SERS sensor for pesticide detection by hydrophobicity change of paper surface. ACS Sensors. 2018;3(1):151–159. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pérez-Jiménez A. I., Lyu D., Lu Z., Liu G., Ren B. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: benefits, trade-offs and future developments. Chemical Science. 2020;11(18):4563–4577. doi: 10.1039/D0SC00809E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Guo Y., Tao Y., Ma X., et al. A dual colorimetric and SERS detection of Hg2+ based on the stimulus of intrinsic oxidase-like catalytic activity of Ag- CoFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018;350:120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Huang J. A., Mousavi M. Z., Zhao Y., et al. SERS discrimination of single DNA bases in single oligonucleotides by electro-plasmonic trapping. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):p. 5321. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13242-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Almehmadi L. M., Curley S. M., Tokranova N. A., Tenenbaum S. A., Lednev I. K. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for single molecule protein detection. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):p. 12356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48650-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bodelón G., Pastoriza-Santos I. Recent progress in surface-enhanced Raman scattering for the detection of chemical contaminants in water. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2020;8:p. 478. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li D. W., Qu L. L., Hu K., Long Y. T., Tian H. Monitoring of endogenous hydrogen sulfide in living cells using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) 2015;54(43):12758–12761. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang W. S., Wang Y. N., Xu Z. R. High sensitivity and non-background SERS detection of endogenous hydrogen sulfide in living cells using core-shell nanoparticles. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2020;1094:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.09.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Singh A. T., Lantigua D., Meka A., Taing S., Pandher M., Camci-Unal G. Paper-based sensors: Emerging themes and applications. Sensors. 2018;18(9, article 2838) doi: 10.3390/s18092838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Martinez A. W., Phillips S. T., Whitesides G. M., Carrilho E. Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Analytical Chemistry. 2010;82(1):3–10. doi: 10.1021/ac9013989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rosolina S. M., Carpenter T. S., Xue Z. L. Bismuth-based, disposable sensor for the detection of hydrogen sulfide gas. Analytical Chemistry. 2016;88(3):1553–1558. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Carpenter T. S., Rosolina S. M., Xue Z. L. Quantitative, colorimetric paper probe for hydrogen sulfide gas. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017;253:846–851. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ahn Y. J., Han S. H., Lee G. J. Rapid and simple colorimetric detection of hydrogen sulfide using an etching-resistant effect on silver nanoprisms. Microchimica Acta. 2021;188(4):p. 129. doi: 10.1007/s00604-021-04783-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lee J., Lee Y. J., Ahn Y. J., Choi S., Lee G. J. A simple and facile paper-based colorimetric assay for detection of free hydrogen sulfide in prostate cancer cells. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2018;256:828–834. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zong S., Wang Z., Chen H., et al. Colorimetry and SERS dual-mode detection of telomerase activity: combining rapid screening with high sensitivity. Nanoscale. 2014;6(3):1808–1816. doi: 10.1039/C3NR04942F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sharma S., Jaiswal A., Uttam K. N. Colorimetric and surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection of metal ions in aqueous medium using sensitive, robust and novel pectin functionalized silver nanoparticles. Analytical Letters. 2020;53(15):2355–2378. doi: 10.1080/00032719.2020.1743715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gahlaut S. K., Yadav K., Sharan C., Singh J. P. Quick and selective dual mode detection of H2S gas by mobile app employing silver nanorods array. Analytical Chemistry. 2017;89(24):13582–13588. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhong K., Chen L., Pan Y., et al. A colorimetric and near-infrared fluorescent probe for detection of hydrogen sulfide and its real multiple applications. Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2019;221, article 117135 doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Paul N., Sarkar R., Sarkar R., Barui A., Sarkar S. Detection of hydrogen sulfide using BODIPY based colorimetric and fluorescent on-off chemosensor. Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2020;132(1):p. 21. doi: 10.1007/s12039-019-1724-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ahn Y. J., Gil Y. G., Lee Y. J., Jang H., Lee G. J. A dual-mode colorimetric and SERS detection of hydrogen sulfide in live prostate cancer cells using a silver nanoplate-coated paper assay. Microchemical Journal. 2020;155:p. 104724. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liu C., Liu J., Zhang W., et al. A ruthenium(II) complex-based probe for colorimetric and luminescent detection and imaging of hydrogen sulfide in living cells and organisms. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2021;1145:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
