Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;36(4):845–854. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.1098

Table 3.

Risk of NAFLD Development According to Obesity Status at Baseline and Body Weight Variability

Presence of NAFLD Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Normal and low ASVW 655 (9.2) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Normal and high ASVW 1,078 (16.7) 1.84 (1.65–2.04) 1.81 (1.63–2.02) 1.80 (1.61–2.01)
Obese and low ASVWa 203 (38.3) 3.94 (3.23–4.80) 3.12 (2.55–3.83) 2.77 (2.26–3.41)
Obese and high ASVW 470 (37.5) 4.44 (3.84–5.13) 3.52 (3.03–4.09) 3.11 (2.66–3.62)
Normal and low CV 673 (9.8) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Normal and high CV 1,060 (15.8) 1.99 (1.79–2.22) 2.05 (1.84–2.29) 2.05 (1.84–2.29)
Obese and low CVa 301 (36.2) 3.45 (2.92–4.07) 2.80 (2.36–3.33) 2.50 (2.10–2.97)
Obese and high CV 372 (39.1) 5.36 (4.57–6.28) 4.27 (3.62–5.03) 3.76 (3.18–4.44)

Values are expressed as number (%) or odds ratio (95% confidence interval). Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: Adjusted for Model 1+fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, exercise, and alcohol intake; Model 3: Adjusted for Model 2+homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, glycated hemoglobin, aspartate transaminase.

NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ASVW, average successive variability of weight; CV, coefficient of variation.

a

Body mass index cut off of 25 kg/m2 was used to define obesity in the Korean population in this study.