Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;36(12):1950–1958. doi: 10.1002/gps.5609

TABLE 2.

Social and professional support during the first lockdown according to the living area

Urban Rural p Regressions adjusted on age and gender
n (%) n (%) OR (95%CI) p
Good perceived social support 202 (89.0%) 204 (97.1%) 0.0009 3.09 (1.11–8.59) 0.0310
Phone calls
Family 221 (93.6%) 202 (94.8%) 0.5893 0.89 (0.35–2.27) 0.8059
Friends 160 (68.1%) 157 (74.1%) 0.1651 0.96 (0.58–1.58) 0.8603
Neighbours 71 (30.2%) 66 (31.1%) 0.8333 0.77 (0.46–1.30) 0.3325
Visits
Family 74 (31.8%) 127 (59.6%) <.0001 3.93 (2.41–6.42) <.0001
Mean number of family visits/week 1.0 (2.6) 3.3 (6.5) <.0001 3.37 (0.56) b <.0001
Friends 8 (3.4%) 18 (8.5%) 0.0218 2.20 (0.79–6.14) 0.1318
Neighbours 29 (12.3%) 26 (13.2%) 0.7837 1.50 (0.78–2.89) 0.2241
Volunteers 1 (0.4%) 5 (2.4%) 0.0742 3.68 (0.29–46.72) 0.3147
Use of digital communication device 56 (24.1%) 39 (18.4%) 0.1406 0.38 (0.20–0.73) 0.0034
Professional services a 121 (50.2%) 66 (30.1%) <.0001 0.88 (0.55–1.41) 0.5911
a

Nurse, personal care assistant, meal delivery ….

b

Linear regression, parameter estimate (standard error).