TABLE 4.
Structural model assessment
| Structural paths | Path coefficient | t value | 95 percentile CI | Decision | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control variables | |||||
| Gender → NB | 0.063 | 1.042 | [−0.019, 0.108] | n.s. | |
| Age → NB | −0.090 | 1.152 | [−0.022, 0.115] | n.s. | |
| Education → NB | 0.180 | 2.114 | [0.141, 0.238] | Significant | |
| Tenure → NB | −0.197 | 2.301 | [−0.214, −0.053] | Significant | |
| Direct hypotheses | |||||
| H1: SL → NB | −0.318 | 5.457 | [0.225, 0.416] | Supported | |
| H2‐a: SL → PS | 0.325 | 6.092 | [0.103, 0.338] | Supported | |
| H2‐b: PS → NB | −0.342 | 6.450 | [0.143, 0.350] | Supported | |
| Indirect hypothesis (mediation) | |||||
| H2: SL → PS → NB | 0.132 | 03.041 | [0.078, 0.229] | Supported | |
| Quality indicators | |||||
| R 2 Nurses' Burnout = 0.631 | Q 2 Nurses' Burnout = 0.349 | ||||
| R 2 Psychological Safety = 0.290 | Q 2 Psychological Safety = 0.152 | ||||
Note: p < 0.01; t values and CI values were obtained by 5000 Bootstrap runs at two‐tailed significant at 5%.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NB, nurses burnout; n.s., not significant; PS, psychological safety; Q2, predictive quality and strength; R 2, variance explained in predicted variable; SL, servant leadership.