Table 5.
Results of Bayesian meta-analyses probing the mean levels of implicit hair attitudes, self trait judgments, societal trait judgments, and legal judgments among African American and White American participants (Studies 1–4)
| African American participants | White American participants | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohen’s d | BF10 | Cohen’s d | BF10 | |
| Black hair attitude IAT | 0.22 [0.12; 0.31] | 7.72 × 103 | 0.68 [0.64; 0.73] | 6.42 × 10191 |
| Self trait judgments | − 0.63 [− 0.73; − 0.55] | 2.32 × 1031 | − 0.31 [− 0.33; − 0.28] | 2.30 × 1039 |
| Societal trait judgments | 1.42 [1.34; 1.56] | 1.80 × 10110 | 1.09 [1.01; 1.13] | 5.33 × 10344 |
| Legal judgments | − 1.85 [− 1.98; − 1.73] | 1.85 × 10149 | − 1.15 [− 1.21; − 1.11] | 4.75 × 10377 |
Cohen’s d effect sizes are scored such that more positive scores indicate higher levels of bias in favor of Eurocentric hair texture. 95-percent HDIs (highest density intervals) are reported in square brackets. BF10 refers to Bayes Factors providing a relative measure of evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis (μ ≠ 0) over the null hypothesis (μ = 0)