Table 2.
Temperature monitoring device | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Human touch | •Simple and quick •Inexpensive •Easy to implement |
•Only accurate when performed by someone trained |
Mercury-in-glass thermometer | •Traditionally considered gold standard | •Contains mercury •Long time required to reach stable temperature •Variable accuracy due to suboptimal use |
Electronic thermometer | •Poses minimal risk •Provides rapid temperature readings •Probes allow for continuous monitoring and dual monitoring |
•Variable accuracy depending on site •Skin measurements affected by environmental factors |
Infrared tympanic thermometer | •Rapid and painless | •Variable accuracy depending on model used •Temperatures differ between protected & unprotected ears •Expensive |
Temporal artery and mid-forehead infrared thermometers | •Rapid and painless •Causes minimal disturbance to the neonate |
•Variable accuracy depending on site •Measurements affected by environmental factors •Expensive |
Liquid crystal thermometry | •Simple and inexpensive •Able to be understood by non-literate and non-numerate carers •Accurate in detecting hypothermia <35.5°C |
•Does not provide a specific temperature reading •Falls off occasionally |
BEMPU TempWatch | •Continuous monitoring •Able to be understood by non-literate and non-numerate carers •Promotes skin-to-skin contact and weight gain |
•Does not provide a specific temperature reading •Limited studies regarding its accuracy |