Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;12:713697. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.713697

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Distinct kinetic profiles of PD-1+ and PD-1 Tfr cells in cGVHD Cd38−/− versus cGVHD WT mice. (A) Gating strategy to detect PD-1hiCXCR5+ FoxP3+ or PD1CXCR5+FoxP3+ Tfrs cells in spleen cells from cGVHD mice. Left panel: FoxP3 versus CD4 plot of gated CD4+CXCR5+PD-1 cells, showing the frequency of the PD-1FoxP3+ Tfr cells. Middle panel: PD-1 versus CXCR5 plot on gated CD4+ cells showing the gated CXCR5+PD-1hi and CXCR5PD-1 subpopulations. Right panel: FoxP3 versus CD4 plot showing the frequencies of PD-1+FoxP3+ Tfr cells and PD-1FoxP3 Tfr cells. (B) Kinetics of the frequencies of PD1+ (open red circles) and PD-1 (open black circles) Tfr cells relative to total Tfr cells in spleen cells from cGVHD Cd38−/− mice. (C) Kinetics of the frequencies of PD1+ (closed red circles) and PD-1 (closed black circles) Tfr cells relative to total Tfr cells in spleen cells from cGVHD WT mice. (D) Kinetics of total numbers of PD1+ (open red circles) and PD-1 (open black circles) Tfr cells relative to total Tfr cells in spleen cells from cGVHD Cd38−/− mice. (E) Kinetics of total numbers of PD1+ (closed red circles) and PD-1 (closed black circles) Tfr cells relative to total Tfr cells in spleen cells from cGVHD WT mice. The symbols are the mean values and the vertical bars represent ± SEM. P-values are shown for Welch’s t-test. The results are cumulative data from two to three different experiments per time point and mouse type, each with three to four mice per experiment. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001, *****P < 0.00001.