Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 4;20:15330338211039110. doi: 10.1177/15330338211039110

Table 4.

Analysis of Factors Predicting OS.

Items Cox's proportional hazard regression model
P value HR 95% CI
Lower Higher
Univariate Cox's regression
Circ-SMARCA5 expression (high vs low) .025 3.788 1.178 12.179
MiR-432 expression (high vs low) .021 0.225 0.063 0.801
Age (≥60 years vs <60 years) .225 2.191 0.617 7.779
Gender (male vs female) .531 1.611 0.363 7.151
Multiplicity (multiple vs single) .016 3.565 1.263 10.067
Tumor size (≥3.0 cm vs <3.0 cm) .024 3.220 1.165 8.898
Tumor stage (T2-T4 vs Ta&T1) .006 4.547 1.551 13.336
LYN metastasis (yes vs no) .009 4.742 1.480 15.190
Pathological grade (high vs low) .029 3.593 1.141 11.315
Forward stepwise multivariate Cox's regression
Circ-SMARCA5 expression (high vs low) .044 3.370 1.035 10.986
Tumor stage (T2-T4 vs Ta&T1) .010 4.126 1.396 12.192

Factors affecting OS were analyzed by the univariate and forward stepwise multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression model.

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; circ-SMARCA5, circular RNA SMARCA5; miR-432, microRNA-432; LYN, lymph node.