Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;13(8):830–839. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i8.830

Table 1.

Alternatives to the model for end-stage liver disease and model for end-stage liver disease-Na score

Test
Description
Comparison to MELD score
Ref.
MELD-GRAIL Creatinine replaced with GRAIL Improved 90-d mortality predictor in patients with severe disease (MELD-Na > 32), however similar to MELD-Na in patient with lesser disease severity Asrani et al[42,43], 2019
MELD-Lactate Addition of lactate Better predictor of in-hospital mortality when MELD < 15 or when infection is cause of hospitalization. Similar to MELD-Na in non-infectious admissions Sarmast et al[44], 2020
Mahmud et al[45], 2021
MELD-Plus Addition of albumin, total cholesterol, WBC count, age, and length of stay Improved 90-d mortality predictor compared to MELD-Na, however can only be used after a hospital admission Kartoun et al[46], 2017
CLIF-C ACLF Score determined by six different organ systems failures, age and WBC count Improved predictor of 28-d mortality compared to MELD-Na in patients with ACLF. However, only applicable for ACLF and not generalizable for decompensated cirrhosis Jalan et al[51], 2014
Engelmann et al[52], 2018
Ramzan et al[53], 2020

GRAIL: Glomerular filtration rate assessment in liver disease; WBC: White blood cell; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; ACLF: Acute-on-chronic liver failure; CLIF: Chronic liver failure.