Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;77(Pt 9):924–929. doi: 10.1107/S2056989021008057

Table 2. Experimental details.

  90 K 180 K 260 K 273 K 293 K
Crystal data
Chemical formula LiNa3(SO4)2·6H2O LiNa3(SO4)2·6H2O LiNa3(SO4)2·6H2O LiNa3(SO4)2·6H2O LiNa3(SO4)2·6H2O
M r 376.13 376.13 376.13 376.13 376.13
Crystal system, space group Trigonal, R3c:H Trigonal, R3c:H Trigonal, R3c:H Trigonal, R3c:H Trigonal, R3c:H
a, c (Å) 8.3876 (13), 30.048 (7) 8.4006 (19), 30.111 (9) 8.426 (2), 30.197 (4) 8.4337 (17), 30.235 (6) 8.457 (7), 30.33 (3)
V3) 1830.7 (7) 1840.3 (10) 1856.6 (10) 1862.4 (8) 1879 (4)
Z 6 6 6 6 6
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα Mo Kα Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.62 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.60
Crystal size (mm) 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1 0.3 × 0.15 × 0.1
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Stoe IPDS 2 Stoe IPDS 2 Stoe IPDS 2 Stoe IPDS 2 Stoe IPDS 2T
Absorption correction Integration Coppens (1970) Integration Coppens (1970) Integration Coppens (1970) Integration Coppens (1970) Integration Coppens (1970)
Tmin, Tmax 0.924, 0.945 0.682, 0.941 0.864, 0.938 0.773, 0.866 0.517, 0.844
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 12154, 1089, 1089 4345, 1088, 1087 5068, 915, 906 8584, 1159, 1141 1376, 730, 695
R int 0.027 0.035 0.034 0.035 0.054
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.685 0.692 0.643 0.694 0.641
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.013, 0.036, 1.14 0.021, 0.053, 1.18 0.017, 0.043, 1.13 0.019, 0.053, 1.28 0.038, 0.105, 1.11
No. of reflections 1089 1088 915 1159 730
No. of parameters 78 78 78 77 78
No. of restraints 5 1 1 1 5
H-atom treatment All H-atom parameters refined All H-atom parameters refined All H-atom parameters refined All H-atom parameters refined All H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.16, −0.18 0.23, −0.33 0.14, −0.20 0.19, −0.33 0.33, −0.47
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 539 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013) Classical Flack method preferred over Parsons because s.u. lower Flack x determined using 437 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013) Flack x determined using 551 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013) Classical Flack method preferred over Parsons because s.u. lower
Absolute structure parameter 0.01 (3) −0.08 (10) −0.04 (6) 0.04 (4) −0.3 (3)

Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2015), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2017) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).