Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2021 Aug 24;36(8):109615. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109615

Figure 2. Optogenetic activation of LHLEPR neurons does not evoke food intake but is rewarding.

Figure 2.

(A) Schematics of viral injections, free-access feeding, and real-time place preference.

(B and C) Representative images of ChR2, NpHR, and GFP in the LH and optical fiber placements above the LH in Slc32a1Cre mice and LeprCre mice. Scale bar, 500 μm.

(D) LHVGAT neuron photoactivation triggers feeding. Two-way mixed-model ANOVA group × epoch interaction (p = 0.002), Bonferroni post-test (**p = 0.003).

(E) LHVGAT neuron photoinhibition suppresses feeding. Two-way mixed-model ANOVA group × epoch interaction (p = 0.0027), Bonferroni post-test (**p = 0.005).

(F) LHLEPR neuron photoactivation did not affect feeding. Two-way mixed-model ANOVA group × epoch interaction (p = 0.21).

(G) LHLEPR neuron photoinhibition did not affect feeding. Two-way mixed-model ANOVA group × epoch interaction (p = 0.32).

(H) LHVGAT:ChR2 mice displayed significant real-time place preference (p < 0.0001).

(I) LHVGAT:NpHR mice displayed significant real-time place aversion (p = 0.045).

(J) LHLEPR:ChR2 mice displayed significant real-time place preference over control mice (p = 0.0003).

(K) LHLEPR:NpHR mice displayed significant real-time place aversion (p = 0.0049).

Data represented as means ± SEMs; n = 5–10 mice/group.

See also Table S1 for full statistics and Figure S2.