Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 6;45(4):282–291. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000364

Table 3. Current Practice at FIRST-Oslo Clinical Sites, Before Implementation of High-Intensity Training.

50%-100% Assistance to Ambulate 25%-49% Assistance to Ambulate <25% Assistance to Ambulate
2017 Median (IQR)
Question: Out of 5 patients, please rate the number of patients in which you provide each of the following interventions to improve a patient's ability to walk
Task-specific gait training 4.5 (4.0-5.0) 5.0 (5.0-5.0) 5.0 (5.0-5.0)
Weight shifting or pregait activities in standing 4.0 (3.75-5.0) 4.0 (3.0-5.0) 3.0 (1.75-4.25)
Sitting balance activities 3.5 (1.0-5.0) 1.5 (1.0-3.0) 1.0 (0.0-2.25)
Standing balance activities 4.0 (2.5-5.0) 4.0 (4.0-5.0) 5.0 (2.75-5.0)
Therapeutic exercises for strengthening 5.0 (3.0-5.0) 5.0 (4.75-5.0) 5.0 (4.75-5.0)
Stretching 1.5 (0.75-2.0) 1.0 (0.0-1.25) 1.0 (0.75-1.0)
Development positions (4-point, tall kneeling, etc) 0.0 (0.0-1.0) 0.0 (0.0-1.0) 0.5 (0.0-1.25)
Bobath treatment 1.0 (0.0-2.0) 0.5 (0.0-1.5) 0.5 (0.0-2.5)
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation 0.5 (0.0-2.0) 0.5 (0.0-2.25) 0.0 (0.0-1.5)
0 = I do not provide this treatment; 1 = 1 in 5 patients; 2 = 2 in 5 patients; 3 = 3 in 5 patients; 4 = 4 in 5 patients; and 5 = 5 in 5 patients
2017 Median (IQR)
Question: Please complete the following questions about your perceptions related to current gait training practices for individuals with stroke
I have sufficient knowledge and skills to use body weight support treadmill training on all of my patients. 4.0 (3.0-4.0)
I have sufficient knowledge and skills to use gait training overground on all of my patients. 4.0 (4.0-5.0)
I have sufficient knowledge and skills to use high-intensity gait training (aims to achieve 70%-85% heart rate maximum and/or rating of perceived exertion of 14-17). 4.0 (3.0-5.0)
If I focus mostly on gait training in my sessions, I feel that I can still adequately address my patients' other impairment areas (such as balance, transfers, etc). 3.0 (3.0-3.25)
The use of the high-intensity gait training program still allows for me to make my own clinical decisions. 3.5 (3.0-4.0)
Coworkers support the use of high-intensity gait training. 4.0 (3.0-4.0)
My supervisor supports the use of high-intensity gait training. 4.5 (3.75-5.0)
Patients support the use of high-intensity gait training. 3.5 (3.0-4.0)
Most of my patients are too impaired to undergo high-intensity gait training. 4.0 (3.0-4.0)
I do not have enough time to provide the recommended dose of high-intensity gait training to my patients. 4.0 (3.0-4.0)
I can provide high-intensity gait training in a safe manner to my patients. 4.0 (3.0-4.0)
The high-intensity gait training program improves the quality of my patient treatment. 3.0 (3.0-4.0)
The use of high-intensity gait training is an integral part of my treatment. 4.0 (3.0-4.0)
My coworkers and I provide gait training to our patients with a similar dose (number of steps, minutes per session, number of sessions per week) to all patients. 4.0 (3.75-4.25)
1 = completely disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neutral; 4 = agree; 5 = completely agree

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.