TABLE 4.
Efficacy Outcomes 1 Year After Sutured Artificial Iris and IOL Implantation Combined With Penetrating Keratoplasty
| ID | VFQ-25 | Daytime Glare Symptom Score | Nighttime Glare Symptom Score | Daytime Light Sensitivity Score | Nighttime Light Sensitivity Score | Global Aesthetic Improvement (Final) | Artificial Iris Centered?* | |||||
| Baseline | 1 Year | Baseline | 1 Year | Baseline | 1 Year | Baseline | 1 Year | Baseline | 1 Year | |||
| 1 | 77 | 93 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | Very much improved | No, 1 mm inferiorly |
| 2 | 62 | 65 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | Very much improved | No, 1 mm superiorly |
| 3 | 91 | 88 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Very much improved | Yes |
| 4 | 74 | 77 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | Very much improved | No, 1 mm superiorly |
| 5 | 62 | 67 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Very much improved | Yes |
| 6 | 93 | 93 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Much improved | Yes |
| 7 | 79 | 82 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Improved | No, 1 mm inferotemporally |
| 8 | 88 | 97 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Improved | No, 2 mm nasally |
| 9 | 53 | 58 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Much improved | Yes |
| 10 | 86 | 84 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | No change | No, 2 mm inferiorly |
| 11 | 79 | 93 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Much improved | No, 1 mm inferiorly |
| 12 | 72 | 75 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Much improved | No, 1 mm inferiorly |
| 13 | 59 | 59 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | Improved | No, 1 mm temporally |
| 14 | 75 | 85 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | Very much improved | No, 1 mm temporally |
| Average | 72 | 77 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 13/14 (92.9%) improved to very much improved | 4/14 (28.6%) centered |
| SD | 10 | 9 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.1 | ||
| P Value | <0.01 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.12 | |||||||
*
At final examination.
ID, patient identity.