Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):184–190. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_33_20

Table 3.

Comparison between first and fourth session of 50 patients who underwent four sessions

Grading and percentage of improvement No. of patients (%) after first session No. of patients (%) after fourth session P-value
Poor (≤ 19%) 21 (42%) 3 (6%) 1
Fair (20–39%) 28 (56%) 7 (14%) 0.6
Good (40–59%) 1 (2%) 15 (30%) 0.05
Very good (60–79%) 0 (0%) 23 (46%) 0.02
Excellent (≥ 80%) 0 (0%) 2 (4%) 0.05
Total (n=50) 50 (100%) 50 (100%)