Table 5.

Image quality in all cases of the three sequences in breath-hold failure cases

	Conventional LAVA	Turbo-LAVA	DISCO
No or mild artifact	7/21 (33.3%)	13/26 (50.0%)	37/52 (71.2%)
P-value	Control	0.3742	0.0039*
Adequate scan timing	19/21 (90.5%)	24/26 (92.3%)	52/52 (100%)
P-value	Control	0.8230	0.0240*
Diagnosable image	7/21 (33.3%)	13/26 (50.0%)	37/52 (71.2%)
P-value	Control	0.3742	0.0039*

^*P < 0.05.

Data of Turbo-LAVA and DISCO were compared with those of conventional LAVA using the χ²-test. Categorical variables are expressed as percentage with numerators and denominators. DISCO, differential sub-sampling with Cartesian ordering; LAVA, liver acquisition with volume acceleration.