Table 7.

Image quality in risk factor-matched cases of the three sequences in breath-hold failure cases

	Conventional LAVA	Turbo-LAVA	DISCO
No or mild artifact	7/21 (33.3%)	11/21 (52.4%)	20/28 (71.4%)
P-value	Control	0.3499	0.0105*
Adequate scan timing	19/21 (90.5%)	19/21 (90.5%)	28/28 (100%)
P-value	Control	1.0000	0.1786
Diagnosable image	7/21 (33.3%)	11/21 (52.4%)	20/28 (71.4%)
P-value	Control	0.3499	0.0105*

^*P < 0.05.

Data of Turbo-LAVA and DISCO were compared with those of conventional LAVA using the χ²-test. Categorical variables are expressed as percentage with numerators and denominators. DISCO, differential sub-sampling with Cartesian ordering; LAVA, liver acquisition with volume acceleration.