Table 5.
Changes in car and bus usage by land price.
| Variable |
Car |
Bus |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. | |||
| Fixed effect | ||||||
| Intercept | 7.556 | 0.423 | ⁎⁎⁎ | 0.278 | 0.148 | ⁎ |
| Number of confirmed cases | −0.007 | 0.002 | ⁎⁎⁎ | −0.056 | 0.002 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Weekend | −0.264 | 0.006 | ⁎⁎⁎ | −0.400 | 0.007 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Residential use | −0.618 | 0.732 | 2.386 | 0.904 | ⁎⁎⁎ | |
| Commercial/office use | 2.680 | 1.059 | ⁎⁎ | 4.912 | 1.333 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Land price | 0.260 | 0.118 | ⁎⁎ | 0.513 | 0.136 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Length of arterial roads | 0.047 | 0.029 | ||||
| Number of bus routes | 0.041 | 0.009 | ⁎⁎⁎ | |||
| Population | 0.081 | 0.047 | ⁎ | 0.511 | 0.044 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Employment | −0.015 | 0.072 | 0.131 | 0.040 | ⁎⁎⁎ | |
| Temperature: cold | −0.002 | 0.004 | 0.024 | 0.005 | ⁎⁎⁎ | |
| Temperature: hot | 0.072 | 0.008 | ⁎⁎⁎ | 0.112 | 0.011 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Precipitation | −0.003 | 0.000 | ⁎⁎⁎ | −0.007 | 0.000 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Land price ∗ Weekend | 0.039 | 0.007 | ⁎⁎⁎ | −0.120 | 0.010 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Number of confirmed cases ∗ Weekend | −0.023 | 0.003 | ⁎⁎⁎ | −0.024 | 0.003 | ⁎⁎⁎ |
| Number of confirmed cases ∗ Land price | −0.007 | 0.002 | ⁎⁎⁎ | −0.007 | 0.003 | ⁎⁎ |
| Number of confirmed cases ∗ Land price ∗ Weekend | −0.005 | 0.003 | ⁎ | −0.016 | 0.005 | ⁎⁎ |
| Random effect | Variance | Std. Dev. | Variance | Std. Dev. | ||
| Cells | 0.343 | 0.585 | 0.704 | 0.839 | ||
| Number of groups | 167 | 398 | ||||
| Number of observations | 14,980 | 35,007 | ||||
| R-squared | 0.364 | 0.365 | ||||
| Adj. R-squared | 0.364 | 0.365 | ||||
| Breusch-Pagan test | 0.000 (chisq = 559,610) | 0.000 (chisq = 990,914) | ||||
Notes: reference for categorical variables (temperature: moderate, weekend: weekdays), statistical significance notation (⁎⁎⁎p < 0.01, ⁎⁎p < 0.05, ⁎p < 0.1).