Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 25;8:729523. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.729523

Table 2.

Correlations between Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and axial length/spherical equivalent.

All groups (n = 75) Low myopic group (n = 24) Middle myopic group (n = 33) High myopic group (n = 18) p-valuea Axial length Spherical equivalent
r p-value r p-value
Global 369.75 ± 61.05 368.67 ± 63.64 367.76 ± 57.72 374.83 ± 66.59 0.99 0.20 0.08b −0.07 0.54c
Temporal 265.93 ± 55.50 269.13 ± 56.37 259.03 ± 55.98 274.33 ± 55.02 0.52 0.22 0.05c −0.07 0.54c
Superotemporal 367.31 ± 73.80 365.96 ± 68.26 362.06 ± 75.06 378.72 ± 81.28 0.84 0.19 0.10b −0.08 0.50c
Inferotemporal 396.67 ± 73.94 407.79 ± 68.68 384.46 ± 71.55 404.22 ± 85.18 0.44 0.17 0.15b −0.03 0.78c
Nasal 404.20 ± 71.93 395.88 ± 80.83 410.27 ± 64.42 404.17 ± 75.49 0.69 0.17 0.14b −0.06 0.62c
Superonasal 423.49 ± 74.61 421.08 ± 69.92 425.70 ± 74.05 422.67 ± 85.30 0.93 0.19 0.10b −0.06 0.60c
Inferonasal 430.25 ± 70.91 429.63 ± 68.81 425.94 ± 66.01 439.00 ± 84.62 0.84 0.14 0.24b −0.11 0.33c

BMO-MRW, Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (μm).

a

Kruskal–Wallis test.

b

Pearson correlation analysis.

c

Spearman correlation analysis.