Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 25;12:727744. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.727744

Table 3.

The AUCs comparison with other state-of-the-art methods under five-fold CV based on HMDD v2.0.

Models AUC (%)
PBMDA (You et al., 2017) 91.72
GRNMF (Xiao et al., 2018) 86.90
MDHGI (Chen et al., 2018e) 87.94
BNPMDA (Chen et al., 2018d) 89.80
MCLPMDA (Yu et al., 2019) 93.25
NIMCGCN (Li et al., 2020a) 92.91
GAEMDA (Li et al., 2020b) 93.56
Our-best 94.52
Our-average 93.88

Bold values indicates highlight our results.