Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 3;4(11):e202101057. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202101057

Figure 5. Recruitment of ARH3 to DNA damage site.

Figure 5.

(A) Subcellular fractions of patient (V335G) and control (cntr: healthy individual) fibroblasts treated with H2O2 to induce DNA damage, immunoblotted for α-tubulin (cytosolic control), H3 (nuclear control) and VDAC1 (mitochondrial control) in whole cell lysate, nuclear fraction (nucl), cytosolic fraction (cyto) and mitochrondial fraction (mito). (B, C) Quantification of ARH3 expression of V335G mutant relative to control (cntr: healthy individual) per fraction normalized to the respective subcellular fraction control α-tubulin/H3/α-tubulin/VDAC1 (n = 4, mean and SD) (C) quantification of panADPr signal of V335G mutant relative to control (cntr: healthy individual) per fraction normalized to the respective subcellular fraction control α-tubulin/H3 (n = 4, mean and SD).