Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;20:90. doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00929-w

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics of the current study with those of previous studies

Current study (n = 18) Miyai et al. (immediate intervention group: n = 21) [6] Bunn et al. (therapy group: n = 6) [8]
Intervention duration (weeks) 2 4 4
Intervention program Robot-assisted gait training Physical/occupational therapy Home-based balance exercise

Age (years)

Mean ± SD

62.8 ± 10.0 63.5 ± 11.0 60.2 ± 10.5

SARA score baseline

Mean ± SD

10.6 ± 4.0 12.2 ± 3.2 11.8 ± 6.7

Difference in SARA score after the intervention

Mean ± SD

− 0.1 ± 1.7 − 2.8 ± 1.8 − 1.8 ± 1.9

Improvement rate of 10 mWT (%)

Mean

19.0 19.6 N/A

The improvement rate was calculated as the difference of values between post-intervention and pre-intervention divided by the value at pre-intervention. Each data in the study Miyai et al. were presented as “mean ± standard error”; thus, we calculated the standard deviation of each data in the study as follows: standard deviation = square root of sample size × standard error

N/A: not available; 10 mWT: 10-m walking time; SARA: Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia