Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;22:430. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04300-7

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a Top 1% ranked proteins. b Top 5% ranked proteins. c Top 10% ranked proteins. d Top 15% ranked proteins. e Top 20% ranked proteins. f Top 25% ranked proteins. This figure illustrates the comparison of the number of essential proteins predicted by TGSO and 13 competing methods on the DIP dataset. The graph shows the number of truly essential proteins found by each method. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of proteins ranked in each highest percentage