Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Risk Uncertain. 2020 Jul 22;60(3):281–307. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09329-2

Table 3.

Summary Statistics for GS with and without THC question

GS with THC GS w/o THC
E-cigs more harmful 0.31 [0.46] 0.31 [0.46]
Predicted risk perception 0.19 [0.16] 0.18 [0.16]
EVALI outbreak began 1.00 [0.00] 1.00 [0.00]
CDC suspected THC 0.48 [0.50] 0.34 [0.47]
Female 0.46 [0.50] 0.45 [0.50]
Age (Ref=18–24)
 25–34 0.18 [0.38] 0.18 [0.38]
 35–44 0.17 [0.37] 0.17 [0.37]
 45–54 0.18 [0.39] 0.18 [0.38]
 55–64 0.18 [0.39] 0.18 [0.38]
 65+ 0.18 [0.38] 0.18 [0.38]
Census Div. (Ref=New England)
 Middle Atlantic 0.11 [0.31] 0.11 [0.31]
 East North Central 0.11 [0.32] 0.12 [0.33]
 West North Central 0.09 [0.30] 0.09 [0.29]
 South Atlantic 0.20 [0.40] 0.21 [0.40]
 East South Central 0.08 [0.28] 0.08 [0.27]
 West South Central 0.09 [0.28] 0.09 [0.29]
 Mountain 0.14 [0.35] 0.13 [0.33]
 Pacific 0.10 [0.30] 0.11 [0.32]
Year 2,019.2 [0.43] 2,019.2 [0.38]
Obs 8,518 12,666

Notes: Summary statistics (means) are presented from the four GS waves with the THC reference in the risk perception question and the six GS waves without the THC reference.