Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;2021(9):CD013381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013381.pub2

Mochizuki 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: randomised cross‐over study
Duration: 12 weeks
Location: Japan
Setting: single centre
Participants Population: 44 adults with moderate‐to‐severe COPD
Baseline characteristics
COPD severity: moderate to severe
Age (mean): 75.9 (SE 0.9) years
Male 72%
Smoking history (mean): Hokunalin tape 59.1 (SE 7.0) pack‐years; salmeterol 51.0 (SE 5.8) pack‐years
FEV1: Hokunalin tape 1.14% (SE 0.09%); salmeterol 1.34% (SE 0.11%)
Inclusion criteria: aged ≥ 65 years, moderate‐to‐severe COPD, spirometry postbronchodilator FEV1:FVC ratio < 0.70, FEV1 30–80%
Exclusion criteria: aged < 65 years, no airway limitation, dementia, previous inhaled medication (β2 agonist, anticholinergics, corticosteroids, patched β2 agonists, skin disorders, severe heart disease, unstable hypertension, other conditions in which patch or treatment with β2 agonists used
Interventions Treatment arms
  1. Intervention: Hokunalin tape 2 mg once daily

  2. Control: Salmeterol 50 µg twice daily


Allowed co‐medications: previous inhaled medications not allowed
Outcomes Primary outcomes: adherence (duration for which a participant took a given medication as prescribed), quality of life (SGRQ)
Secondary outcomes: 6MWT, adverse events
Notes Funding: none
Identifiers: UMIN000001503
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was achieved using a random sequence generator.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No further information.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
all outcomes High risk Unblinded study design.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
all outcomes High risk Unblinded study design.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
all outcomes High risk Attrition was higher in the control group compared to the intervention (22% vs 9%).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unable to find a protocol for the trial, so unclear if outcomes were reported as planned. Authors reported that outcome measures were conducted at the end of the second phase as it was (quote) "unlikely that they would be affected by the absence of a washout period."
Other bias Low risk None identified.