TABLE 2.
Characteristics of the complete case population stratified according to arm
| Characteristics | Total | Control | Video | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | % | Count | % | Count | % | P | |
| 132 | 100 | 68 | 100 | 64 | 100 | ||
| Age, mean (SD), y | 51.2 (14.6) | 52.1 (14.4) | 50.3 (14.9) | 0.37 | |||
| Gender | 0.47 | ||||||
| Male | 77 | 58.3 | 38 | 55.9 | 39 | 60.9 | |
| Female | 54 | 40.9 | 29 | 42.6 | 25 | 39.1 | |
| Other | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | |
| First language | 0.25 | ||||||
| English | 114 | 86.4 | 61 | 89.7 | 53 | 82.8 | |
| Other | 18 | 13.6 | 7 | 10.3 | 11 | 17.2 | |
| Ethnicitya | |||||||
| White | 93 | 70.5 | 49 | 72.1 | 44 | 68.8 | 0.68 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.97 |
| Black/African American | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | 0.17 |
| First Nations/Metis/Inuit | 19 | 14.4 | 10 | 14.7 | 9 | 14.1 | 0.91 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 20 | 15.2 | 8 | 11.8 | 12 | 18.8 | 0.26 |
| Other | 1 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.30 |
| Work status | 0.86 | ||||||
| Unemployed/temporarily cannot work | 15 | 11.4 | 7 | 10.3 | 8 | 12.5 | |
| Disability income | 36 | 27.3 | 18 | 26.5 | 18 | 28.1 | |
| Working | 44 | 33.3 | 24 | 35.3 | 20 | 31.3 | |
| Retired | 28 | 21.2 | 15 | 22.1 | 13 | 20.3 | |
| Other/prefer not to say | 9 | 6.8 | 4 | 5.9 | 5 | 7.8 | |
| Highest level of education | 0.36 | ||||||
| Middle school | 4 | 3.0 | 1 | 1.5 | 3 | 4.7 | |
| High school | 37 | 28.0 | 18 | 26.5 | 19 | 29.7 | |
| University/graduate studies | 42 | 31.8 | 21 | 30.9 | 21 | 32.8 | |
| Trade/technical training | 45 | 34.1 | 27 | 39.7 | 18 | 28.1 | |
| Prefer not to say | 4 | 3.0 | 1 | 1.5 | 3 | 4.7 | |
| Marital status | 0.82 | ||||||
| Unmarried | 22 | 16.7 | 10 | 14.7 | 12 | 18.8 | |
| Married/common law | 84 | 63.6 | 45 | 66.2 | 39 | 60.9 | |
| Divorced/widowed/separated | 22 | 16.7 | 11 | 16.2 | 11 | 17.2 | |
| Prefer not to say | 4 | 3.0 | 2 | 2.9 | 2 | 3.1 | |
| Support person | 0.94 | ||||||
| Yes | 126 | 95.5 | 65 | 95.6 | 61 | 95.3 | |
| No | 6 | 4.5 | 3 | 4.4 | 3 | 4.7 | |
| Living (community) | 0.42 | ||||||
| Rural or reserve | 33 | 25.0 | 15 | 22.1 | 18 | 28.1 | |
| Urban | 99 | 75 | 53 | 77.9 | 46 | 71.9 | |
| Driving distance to transplant center | 0.35 | ||||||
| Within 1 h | 96 | 72.7 | 52 | 76.5 | 44 | 68.6 | |
| >1 but <5 h | 34 | 25.8 | 15 | 22.1 | 19 | 29.7 | |
| >5 h | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.6 | |
| Previous transplant | 0.61 | ||||||
| No | 107 | 81.1 | 54 | 79.4 | 53 | 82.8 | |
| Yes | 25 | 18.9 | 14 | 20.6 | 11 | 17.2 | |
| On dialysis | |||||||
| Yes | 104 | 78.8 | 51 | 75.0 | 53 | 82.8 | 0.27 |
| Time on dialysisb | 0.15 | ||||||
| <1 y | 28 | 26.9 | 11 | 21.6 | 17 | 32.0 | |
| 1–5 y | 48 | 46.1 | 24 | 47.1 | 24 | 45.2 | |
| 5–10 y | 17 | 16.3 | 9 | 17.6 | 8 | 15.1 | |
| >10 y | 11 | 10.6 | 7 | 13.7 | 4 | 7.5 | |
| Type of dialysisb | 0.31 | ||||||
| Hemodialysis | 77 | 74.0 | 41 | 80.4 | 36 | 67.9 | |
| Peritoneal dialysis | 27 | 26.0 | 10 | 19.6 | 17 | 32.0 | |
| Stage of transplant process | 0.71 | ||||||
| In assessment | 74 | 56.0 | 38 | 55.9 | 36 | 56.2 | |
| Approved for transplant | 35 | 26.5 | 17 | 25.0 | 18 | 28.1 | |
| Was listed, but status on hold | 15 | 11.4 | 11 | 16.2 | 4 | 6.3 | |
| Do not know | 8 | 6.1 | 2 | 2.9 | 6 | 9.4 | |
| Possible or confirmed living donor | 0.76 | ||||||
| Yes | 104 | 78.8 | 51 | 75 | 53 | 82.8 | |
| No | 28 | 21.2 | 17 | 25 | 11 | 17.2 | |
| How often requires help reading hospital materials | 0.13 | ||||||
| Never | 77 | 58.3 | 44 | 64.7 | 33 | 51.6 | |
| Anytime | 55 | 41.7 | 24 | 35.3 | 31 | 48.4 | |
| Confidence filling out forms without assistance | 0.80 | ||||||
| Extremely | 84 | 63.6 | 44 | 64.7 | 40 | 62.5 | |
| Quite a bit/somewhat | 46 | 34.8 | 23 | 33.8 | 23 | 35.9 | |
| A little bit/not at all | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.6 | |
| Read brochures about transplant | 106 | 80.3 | 55 | 80.9 | 51 | 79.7 | 0.83 |
| Previously watched videos about transplant | 57 | 43.2 | 29 | 42.6 | 28 | 43.8 | 0.90 |
| Browsed internet about transplant | 86 | 65.2 | 42 | 61.8 | 44 | 68.8 | 0.40 |
aSince respondents could choose >1 option, P values were calculated between each for race/ethnicity separately.
bThe denominator used was the number of patients on dialysis.