Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;41(36):7687–7696. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0353-21.2021

Table 1.

Participant demographics, PET, and sleep characteristicsa

Demographics (n = 89)
Age, yr 78.1 ± 7.6
Female, n (%) 56 (63)
APOE e4 carriers,b n (%) 23 (27)
Education, yr 17.0 ± 2.0
Mini-Mental State Examination 28.6 ± 1.4
Body mass index 25.6 ± 4.2
PET imaging
    PiB status, n (%) PiB+ 45 (51)
PiB- 44 (49)
    FTP Braak staging, n (%) Braak 0: 16 (18)
Braak I/II: 57 (64)
Braak III/IV: 16 (18)
    PiB+ within FTP Braak stage, n (%) Braak 0: 4 PiB+ (25)
Braak I/II: 29 PiB+ (51)
Braak III/IV: 12 PiB+ (75)
Actigraphy-measured sleep
    Nights recorded 6.8 ± 1.0
    Sleep period time, h 7.9 ± 1.0
    Sleep duration, h 7.2 ± 1.1
    Sleep efficiency, % 90.9 ± 7.8
    Fragmentation index 0.87 ± 0.62
Self-reported sleep
    PSQI global score 4.6 ± 2.9
    Sleep duration, h 7.2 ± 1.1
    Sleep efficiency, % 87.0 ± 9.7

aData are mean ± SD. PiB status was determined based on a DVR threshold of 1.065 (Villeneuve et al., 2015). FTP Braak staging, indexing the progression of tau pathology, was assigned to one of four stages based on FTP uptake in Braak-based composite regions, described previously (Maass et al., 2017).

bAPOE genotyping data are not available for 5 subjects.