Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;12:709851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709851

Table 3.

The results of the subgroup analysis.

Outcomes Sources of heterogeneity Subgroup differences Categories k pooled SMD lower 95% CI upper 95% CI z P
Emotional problems in children Developmental/ Behavioral problems P = 0.02 Yes 9 −0.355 −0.733 0.023 1.84 0.066
No 4 −0.314 −0.565 −0.062 2.45 0.014*
Level of Triple P P < 0.001 Third level 4 0.088 −0.129 0.304 0.79 0.427
Fourth level 8 −0.612 −0.946 −0.278 3.59 0.000***
Delivery format P < 0.001 Face to face + telephone 4 −0.761 −1.040 −0.481 5.34 0.000***
Face to face 6 −0.234 −0.654 0.186 1.09 0.274
Online 2 −0.151 −0.714 0.411 0.53 0.598
Service method P < 0.001 Group 5 −0.230 −0.722 0.262 0.92 0.359
Self-directed 2 −0.151 −0.714 0.411 0.53 0.598
Group + case 4 −0.761 −1.040 −0.481 5.34 0.000***
Country P < 0.001 Australia 8 −0.221 −0.563 0.121 1.27 0.205
Other countries 4 −0.529 −1.019 −0.040 2.12 0.034*
Behavioral Problems in Children Level of Triple P P < 0.001 Third level 3 0.143 −0.304 0.590 0.63 0.531
Fourth level 12 −0.758 −1.184 −0.332 3.49 0.000***
Delivery format P < 0.001 Face to face + telephone 8 −3.004 −4.721 −1.288 3.43 0.001***
Face to face 7 −0.408 −1.022 0.206 1.30 0.193
Online + telephone 2 −0.015 −0.400 0.370 0.08 0.938
Service method P < 0.001 Case 3 −0.017 −0.603 0.569 0.06 0.956
Group 4 −0.695 −1.618 0.228 1.48 0.14
Group + case 9 −2.676 −4.267 −1.086 3.3 0.001***
Setting P < 0.001 Community 2 −0.377 −0.931 0.178 1.33 0.183
Hospital and clinic 6 −3.928 −6.437 −1.419 3.07 0.002**
University 4 −1.055 −1.751 −0.359 2.97 0.003**
Online 2 −0.015 −0.400 0.370 0.08 0.938
Health care center 2 0.203 −0.536 0.941 0.54 0.590
Parenting Level of Triple P P < 0.001 Third level 6 0.013 −0.381 0.407 0.06 0.949
Style Fourth level 10 −0.615 −0.855 −0.376 5.04 0.000***
Delivery format P < 0.001 Face to face + telephone 7 −0.917 −1.208 −0.626 6.18 0.000***
Face to face 8 −0.088 −0.404 0.227 0.55 0.584
Online + telephone 2 −0.443 −0.737 −0.150 2.96 0.003**
Service method P < 0.001 Case 2 0.468 −0.611 1.547 0.85 0.395
Group 6 −0.287 −0.503 −0.072 2.62 0.009**
Group + case 7 −0.917 −1.208 −0.626 6.18 0.000***
Self-directed + case 2 −0.443 −0.737 −0.150 2.96 0.003**
Setting P < 0.001 Community 4 −0.322 −0.554 −0.090 2.72 0.007**
Hospital and clinic 4 −0.703 −1.344 −0.061 2.15 0.032*
University 2 −0.609 −0.907 −0.312 4.01 0.000***
Online 3 −0.528 −0.775 −0.281 4.19 0.000***
Health care center 2 0.468 −0.611 1.547 0.85 0.395
University and community 2 −0.515 −1.419 0.388 1.12 0.264
Conflict over Level of Triple P p = 0.13 Third level 3 −0.363 −1.085 0.358 0.99 0.324
Parenting Fourth level 5 −0.349 −0.645 −0.052 2.31 0.021*
Setting P = 0.08 Community 4 −0.478 −0.947 −0.009 2.00 0.046*
Parent-Child Online 2 −0.205 −0.854 0.444 0.62 0.535
Relationship Level Fourth level 4 −0.904 −1.528 −0.280 2.84 0.005**

We conducted a subgroup analysis of the outcomes with high heterogeneity (Q test is significant, p < 0.05 and I2 ≥ 50%). The results of subgroup analysis of only one study were not presented in this Table. k, number of studies; SMD, standard mean difference; CI, confidence interval;

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01.

***

p < 0.001.