Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug 6;285:114307. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114307

Table 1.

Patterns in loneliness across sample characteristics and key EMA social and physical context (n=342; 12,793 EMAs)

Respondent-level (N=342) Demographic characteristics Loneliness mean (range 1–4), within respondent

Proportion or Mean (SD) Mean SD p

Gender ***
 Men 0.40 1.30 0.52
 Women 0.60 1.14 0.29
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 0.27 1.20 0.37
 Non-Hispanic Black 0.51 1.21 0.42
 Non-Black Hispanic 0.22 1.20 0.40
Education
 Less than high school 0.28 1.28 0.47
 High school 0.20 1.18 0.44
 Some college 0.24 1.21 0.39
 College + 0.28 1.15 0.27
Self-reported health status (baseline) ***
 Excellent/very good 0.37 1.11 0.20
 Good 0.41 1.21 0.40
 Fair/poor 0.23 1.32 0.54
Marital status (baseline) *
 Not married 0.68 1.24 0.44
 Married 0.32 1.12 0.30
Employment status (baseline)
 Employed, any 0.20 1.22 0.38
 Not employed 0.80 1.20 0.41
Age 73.69
Household composition (baseline)
 Live alone *
  Yes 0.59 1.28 0.49
  No 0.41 1.16 0.36
 Household size 1.77 (0.84)

EMA-level (N=12,793) Real-time context Loneliness means (range 1–4), by context

% Mean SD p

Physical context ***
 Home 0.74 1.20 0.39
 At work 0.04 1.14 0.21
 In transit 0.09 1.18 0.33
 Someplace else 0.13 1.19 0.38
Social context
 Alone ***
  Yes 0.52 1.26 0.45
  No 0.48 1.13 0.27
 Who with (not mutually exclusive)
  Spouse/partner 0.14 1.07 0.19
  Family member 0.20 1.14 0.29
  Friend 0.09 1.15 0.29
  Pet 0.06 1.09 0.16
  Other 0.04 1.15 0.25

Note. SD = standard deviation. Measures of loneliness are coded so that higher values are more lonely. Results are from t-tests and ANOVA tests of significance of group means.

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001.