Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;156(4):679–690. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab010

Table 3.

Cox Proportional Hazards Ratio Analyses of Variables in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Harboring SF3B1 Mutations Prognostic of Overall Survival

Risk Factor Hazard Ratio 95% CI P
Univariate analysis
 Age, <70 vs ≥70 y 1.80 0.38-8.56 0.46
 Sex, M/F 1.08 0.29-4.03 0.91
 Hemoglobin, <10 vs ≥10 g/dLa 3.16 0.92-14.69 0.095
 Neutrophil count, <0.8 vs ≥0.8 × 109/La 1.04 1.01-1.08 0.012
 Platelet count, <50 vs 50~100 vs ≥100 × 109/La 3.75 0.45-19.34 0.19
 Bone marrow blast counta 0.91 0.05-5.07 0.92
 Ring sideroblasts, % 0.96 0.92-1.00 0.04
 Cytogenetic risks, high/very high vs intermediate/low/very lowa 4.72 0.53-42.40 0.17
 Number of comutations 1.26 0.74-1.98 0.79
SF3B1 VAF. %b 0.72 0.09-8.80 0.78
 Epigenetic comutationsc 0.72 0.18-2.89 0.64
 TF comutationsc 9.67 2.23-41.94 0.003
 IPSS-R score, >3 vs ≤3 7.88 1.72-35.33 0.008
SF3B1-mut-MDS by IWG-PMd 0.46 0.13-1.61 0.23
Multivariate analysis
 TF comutationsc 9.14 1.1-76.1 0.04
 IPSS-R score, >3 vs ≤3 5.12 1.0-26.1 0.049
SF3B1-mut-MDS by IWG-PMd 1.43 0.3-6.76 0.64

IPSS-R, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System; IWG-PM, International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS; SF3B1-mut-MDS, SF3B1-mutant myelodysplastic syndrome; TF, transcription factor; VAF, variant allele fraction.

aIPSS-R categories.

bRange hazard ratio.

cPresent vs absent.

dYes vs no.