Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 9;14:464. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04958-1

Table 4.

Model averaging results from binomial generalized linear mixed models of heartworm infection risk in coyotes (n = 146)

Model Predictor Estimate SE z Pr(> |z|) Mean OR 95% CI
Resident and transient coyotes (n = 146) (Intercept) −0.59 0.45 1.33 0.18 0.55 (0.23–1.33)
Age class (subadult) −0.75 0.46 1.64 0.1 0.47 (0.19–1.16)
Age class (pup) −2.37 1.02 2.33 0.02 0.09 (0.01–0.69)
Prop. low developed in home range −0.22 0.27 0.82 0.41 0.8 (0.48–1.36)
Prop. medium developed in home range −0.63 0.33 1.9 0.06 0.53 (0.28–1.02)
Prop. mosquito habitat in home range 0.33 0.23 1.46 0.15 1.4 (0.89–2.19)
Year −1.74 1.53 1.14 0.26 0.18 (0.01–3.54)
Year (quadratic) 0.75 0.65 1.15 0.25 2.12 (0.59–7.64)
Age class (subadult) * proportion medium developed 1.48 0.48 3.06 0.002 4.39 (1.7–11.3)
Age class (pup) * proportion medium developed −1.26 1.33 0.95 0.34 0.28 (0.02–3.84)
Resident coyotes only (n = 107) (Intercept) −0.49 0.3 1.62 0.1 0.61 (0.35–1.08)
Age class (subadult) −0.75 0.5 1.5 0.13 0.48 (0.18–1.27)
Age class (pup) −3.49 2.66 1.31 0.19 0.02 (0.00–4.48)
Proportion medium developed in home range −0.56 0.34 1.64 0.1 0.57 (0.29–1.12)
Proportion mosquito habitat in home range 0.28 0.25 1.14 0.26 1.32 (0.82–2.14)
Age class (subadult) * proportion medium developed 1.16 0.56 2.07 0.04 3.19 (1.06–9.53)
Age class (pup) * proportion medium developed −3.36 3.83 0.88 0.38 0.03 (0.00–62.73)

Predictors were obtained from the top-ranking models (ΔAICc < 2; Additional file 1: Table S4). Coyote home ranges were estimated by calculating and plotting 95% minimum convex polygons (MCPs). Results using 95% adaptive local convex hulls (a-LoCoH) are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S4 and S5)

SE is the standard error, Pr(> |z|) the P-value associated with the z statistic, and mean OR the mean odds ratio