Table 5:
Inter-rate agreement | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Rater 1 | Rater 2 | ICC (95% CI) | Kappa (95% CI) | |
Total sample (n=285) | 4.28±3.05 | 4.24±2.96 | 0.95 (0.94-0.96) | 0.82 (0.79-0.85) |
NP (n=153) | 5.86±2.82 | 5.82±2.77 | 0.96 (0.95-0.97) | 0.84 (0.79-0.89) |
NNP (n=132) | 2.45±2.15 | 2.41±1.96 | 0.85 (0.79-0.89) | 0.65 (0.58-0.72) |
Coefficients for the entire questionnaire (10 items) †P>0.05 between raters (Friedman’s paired test), ‡P<0.001 (P for intra-class correlation coefficient), § Kappa using a cutoff value > 4 patients. NP: Neuropathic pain, NNP: Nonneuropathic pain (somatic), ICC: Intra-class correlation coefficient, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. † Friedman, Milton (December 1937). “The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance”. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 32 (200): 675–701. doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.1050352 ‡ Donner A, Koval JJ (March 1980). “The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data”. Biometrics. 36 (1): 19-25. doi:10.2307/2530491. JSTOR 2530491. § Cohen, Jacob. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37-46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.