Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Apr 12;12(7):1015–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.04.002

Table 4.

Marginal Effect of Rurality on Caregiver Mastery and Caregiving Burden by Education

Variables Caregiver
Mastery
Self-Esteem Disrupted
Schedule
Financial Problems Lack of Social
Support
Health
Problems
Mean (SD) = 27.5 (4.7) Mean (SD) = 4.4 (0.5) Mean (SD) = 2.6 (0.9) Mean (SD)= 2.0 (0.8) Mean (SD)= 1.9 (0.7) Mean (SD)= 2.0 (0.7)

Main effect
 Rural (ref: urban) −0.34 0.03 0.21*** 0.17** 0.11** 0.04
(−1.18 – 0.49) (−0.07 – 0.12) (0.06 – 0.36) (0.01 – 0.32) (−0.02 – 0.24) (−0.07 – 0.15)
 Education ≥ some college (ref: ≤ high school)
0.01 −0.03 0.15* −0.18*** 0.03 −0.03
(−0.58 – 0.61) (0.09 – −0.04) (0.04 – 0.26) (−0.28 – −0.07) (−0.06 – −0.13) (−0.05 – 0.12)

Interaction effect
Rural (ref: urban)
 ≤ High school −1.27** −0.10 0.25** 0.33*** 0.32*** 0.15*
(−2.40 – −0.14) (−0.22 – 0.04) (0.04 – 0.45) (0.12 – 0.54) (0.14 – 0.50) (0 – 0.31)
 ≥ Some college 0.16 0.09 0.18* 0.07 0 −0.03
(−0.94 – 1.27) (−0.03 – 0.22) (−0.01 – 0.38) (−0.12 – 0.27) (−0.17 – 0.17) (−0.18 – 0.12)
P value of interaction
term 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.07 <0.01 0.10

Notes: SD= standard deviation;

***

p<0.01,

**

p<0.05,

*

p<0.1;

Marginal effects were calculated from the linear mixed models in Table 3;

Models adjusted for caregiver age, gender, relationship, comorbidity, and patient cancer type and number of geriatric impairments, time fixed effect, and practice site random effect;

P value measures the significance of the interaction term of rurality and education based on the linear mixed models.