Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Jul 17;176(2):295–307. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24368

Table 4.

Summary of results for best models (those used to calculate model average estimates) from candidate model Set 1 (male) and Set 2 (female) owl monkeys.

Model Set 1 (Males)
Term Estimate SE Lower CI Upper CI
Model 2
 Intercept 3.34 0.10 3.15 3.54
 Older infant 0.69 0.28 0.15 1.24
 No infant 0.46 0.10 0.26 0.67
Model 4
 Intercept 3.34 0.10 3.14 3.53
 Older infant 0.70 0.28 0.15 1.24
 No infant 0.46 0.10 0.25 0.66
 Replacement 0.04 0.10 −0.15 0.23
Model 7
 Intercept 3.32 0.14 3.04 3.59
 Previous fertility 0.02 0.10 −0.18 0.22
 Older infant 0.71 0.28 0.15 1.26
 No infant 0.46 0.11 0.25 0.67
 Replacement 0.04 0.10 −0.15 0.24
Model Set 2 (Females)
Term Estimate SE Lower CI Upper CI
Model 6
 Intercept 3.92 0.15 3.63 4.21
 Previous fertility −0.16 0.12 −0.40 0.08
 Pregnant 0.54 0.10 0.35 0.73
 Replacement 0.26 0.12 0.02 0.50
Model 8
 Intercept 4.25 0.17 3.91 4.59
 Previous fertility −0.51 0.18 −0.86 −0.16
 Pregnant 0.22 0.20 −0.16 0.61
 Fertility * Pregnant 0.37 0.21 −0.05 0.79
Model 5
 Intercept 4.05 0.14 3.77 4.32
 Previous fertility −0.27 0.11 −0.48 −0.05
 Pregnant 0.52 0.10 3.25 7.09
Model 3
 Intercept 3.79 0.11 3.58 4.00
 Pregnant 0.57 0.10 0.38 0.75
 Replacement 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.55

The table shows estimates (coefficients), standard errors (SE), and lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Models in each set are listed according to their ranked AICc values. Reference categories for variables are as follows: young infant (< 3 months), not pregnant, no adult replacement, and no prior confirmed fertility.