Table 3.
Method of determination and designations regarding ambulatory function in prospective studies that used direct observation of patients
| Study (Y of Publication) | Method of Determination | Designation of Ambulatory Function |
|---|---|---|
| Helweg-Larsen et al. (2000)[19] | Not specified | Ambulatory without assistance; ambulatory with assistance; paretic; paralytic |
| Marquardt et al. (2004)[31] | Not specified | Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory |
| Patchell et al. (2005)[6] | Two steps each foot even if cane and/or walker used | Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory |
| Graham et al. (2006)[49] | Walk score >5/7; Barthel Index walk score >2/3 | Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory |
| Conway et al. (2007)[16] | Not specified | Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory |
| Park et al. (2016)[37] | Nurick Score: Grades 3–5=ambulatory; Grades 1- 2=non-ambulatory |
Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory |
| Fehlings et al. (2016)[8] | Walk 4 steps independently | Independently ambulatory versus not independent |
| Rades et al. (2016)[42] | Not specified | Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory |
| Rades et al. (2018)[50] | Not specified | Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory |
| Hoskin et al. (2019)[21] | Medical Research Council Muscle Power Criteria: Grades 1–2=ambulatory; Grades 3–4=nonambulatory | Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory |
| Thirion et al. (2020)[9] | Not specified (also allowed remote patient report) | Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory |
| Rades et al. (2020)[39] | Study-specific 5-point scale | Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory |