Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine J. 2021 May 13;21(9):1430–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.001

Table 3.

Method of determination and designations regarding ambulatory function in prospective studies that used direct observation of patients

Study (Y of Publication) Method of Determination Designation of Ambulatory Function
Helweg-Larsen et al. (2000)[19] Not specified Ambulatory without assistance; ambulatory with assistance; paretic; paralytic
Marquardt et al. (2004)[31] Not specified Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory
Patchell et al. (2005)[6] Two steps each foot even if cane and/or walker used Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory
Graham et al. (2006)[49] Walk score >5/7; Barthel Index walk score >2/3 Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory
Conway et al. (2007)[16] Not specified Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory
Park et al. (2016)[37] Nurick Score: Grades 3–5=ambulatory; Grades 1-
2=non-ambulatory
Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory
Fehlings et al. (2016)[8] Walk 4 steps independently Independently ambulatory versus not independent
Rades et al. (2016)[42] Not specified Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory
Rades et al. (2018)[50] Not specified Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory
Hoskin et al. (2019)[21] Medical Research Council Muscle Power Criteria: Grades 1–2=ambulatory; Grades 3–4=nonambulatory Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory
Thirion et al. (2020)[9] Not specified (also allowed remote patient report) Ambulatory unaided; ambulatory aided; non-ambulatory
Rades et al. (2020)[39] Study-specific 5-point scale Ambulatory versus non-ambulatory