Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug;10(8):2106–2113. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-314

Table 3. Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups [n (%)].

Group n Recovery Marked effectiveness Effectiveness Ineffectiveness Total effective rate
Study group 62 19 (30.65%) 28 (45.16%) 12 (19.35%) 3 (4.84%) 95.16% (59/62)
Reference group 62 10 (16.13%) 22 (35.48%) 18 (29.03%) 12 (19.35%) 80.65% (50/62)
χ2 9.043
P 0.003

Total effective rate = recovery rate + marked effectiveness rate + effectiveness rate.