Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;19(4):241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.08.002

Table 2.

Details of included studies.

First author, year Study Area Subject Control
Exercise
Endpoints Results
Sample Size Age Sample Size Age
Andersen 2016(1/2)33 Denmark healthy older men 8 67.4 ± 2.7 9 69.1 ± 3.1 HOMA-IR There were no significant differences between 16 weeks group and 56 weeks group.
Botton 201834 Brazil overweight, T2DM elderly 13 68.6 ± 7.06 13 70.6 ± 6.7 HbA1c The training program did not induce significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin values of patients who already had suitable glycemic control.
Brooks 200622 Spain T2DM elderly 31 66 ± 1 31 66 ± 2 HOMA-IR
HbA1c
This was accompanied by reduced insulin resistance [ST: median (interquartile range) −0.7(3.6) vs CON: 0.8(3.8), p = 0.05];
Castaneda 200232 Latin America T2DM elderly 31 66 ± 1 29 66 ± 2 HbA1c Sixteen weeks of RT (three times per week) resulted in reduced plasma glycosylated hemoglobin levels (from 8.7 ± 0.3 to 7.6 ± 0.2%)
de Carvalho Bastone 202041 Brazil Elderly 18 72.50 ± 7.88 17 77.55 ± 4.40 HOMA-IR
HbA1c'
There were no significant differences between groups
Dipietro 2008(1/2/3)30 the United States inactive older women 8 74 ± 5 8 74 ± 5 HOMA-IR We observed significant improvements in 2-h glucose concentrations at 3, 6, and 9 months among women in the RTL
Fatouros 2005(1/2/3)38 Greece overweight and inactive elderly 10 69.8 ± 5.1 14 71.1 ± 3.6 HOMA-IR HOMA-IR increased in all exercise groups (15–39%; P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between groups in the percent HOMA-IR increase
12 69.7 ± 3.8
14 70.8 ± 2.8
Hsieh 201835 Taiwan, China T2DM elderly 15 71.8 ± 4.5 15 70.6 ± 4.2 HbA1c There were no significant differences between groups
Kim 201836 Korea Inactive elderly 10 >65 12 >65 HOMA-IR After six weeks of exercise training, participants in the combined exercise group exhibited significant reduction in insulin, HOMA-IR and chemerin levels, while significant reduction was observed in HOMA-IR only in the resistance exercise group compared with the control group.
Rech 201937 Brazil T2DM elderly 20 68 ± 6.5 14 70.5 ± 7.4 HbA1c No significant differences were found for blood lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin for both groups after the intervention period
Shabkhiz 2020(1/2)39 Iran non-T2DM men 12 72.08 ± 5.33 12 72.08 ± 5.33 HOMA-IR RT significantly decreased glucose and insulin concentration and HOMAIR compared with the C group (main effect for training; p = 0.001, p = 0.01, p = 0.001; respectively)
T2DM men 10 72.45 ± 6.00 10 72.45 ± 6.00 RT showed also a decreasing in the values of HOMA-IR, CRP and TNF-α
Tomeleri 201840 Brazil inactive older women 23 68.8 ± 4.9 22 72.1 ± 6.3 HOMA-IR

The values are shown as the means ± SD.

ST = strength training plus standard care. CON = standard care alone. RT = resistance training. RTL = lower-intensity resistance training.

T2DM = Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; RM = repetition maximum; rep = repetitions; HOMA-IR = Homeostatic Model of Insulin Resistance; HbA1c = Hemoglobin A.