Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;23(8):e29575. doi: 10.2196/29575

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the review.

Study Study design Telehealth type Therapeutic area Outcomes Risk of bias
Ward, 2018 [4] Mixed methods Tele-ED (emergency department)/telemedicine Emergency medicine Feasibility and acceptability Medium
Hicken, 2017 [7] Randomized Internet and telephone-based care Mental health Feasibility and acceptability Low
Stringer, 2018 [8] Mixed methods Electronic adherence monitor HIV Feasibility and acceptability Low
Uscher-Pines, 2019 [9] Randomized Telelactation/telehealth Reproductive care/women’s health Feasibility and acceptability None
Huskamp, 2018 [10] Retrospective Tele–substance use disorder/telemedicine Substance use disorder Telehealth use None
Mehrotra, 2017 [11] Retrospective Telemental/telemedicine Mental health Telehealth use None
Sinha, 2019 [12] Qualitative Telemedicine Orthopedics Patient satisfaction Low
Brecthel, 2018 [13] Retrospective Telestroke Network Acute ischemic stroke Diagnostic validation Low
Kapinos, 2019 [14] Post hoc analysis Telelactation Reproductive care/women’s health Design and demand None
Talbot, 2019 [15] Retrospective Telehealth Mental health Prevalence, diagnosis, and type of service Low
Lewiecki, 2017 [16] Prospective TeleECHO Osteoporosis Acceptability and self-confidence Medium
Moeckli, 2017 [17] Mixed methods Extension for Community Health Outcomes
(ECHO)/telemedicine
HIV Application and acceptability Low
Gilbertson-White, 2019 [18] Mixed methods Oncology Associated Symptoms and Individualized Strategies (OASIS) Cancer Patient needs and satisfaction Low
Liu, 2019 [19] Qualitative Teleophthalmology Ophthalmology Feasibility and acceptability None
Demirci, 2018 [20] Qualitative Telelactation/telemedicine Reproductive care/women’s health Feasibility and acceptability Low