Table 1.
Study | Study design | Telehealth type | Therapeutic area | Outcomes | Risk of bias |
Ward, 2018 [4] | Mixed methods | Tele-ED (emergency department)/telemedicine | Emergency medicine | Feasibility and acceptability | Medium |
Hicken, 2017 [7] | Randomized | Internet and telephone-based care | Mental health | Feasibility and acceptability | Low |
Stringer, 2018 [8] | Mixed methods | Electronic adherence monitor | HIV | Feasibility and acceptability | Low |
Uscher-Pines, 2019 [9] | Randomized | Telelactation/telehealth | Reproductive care/women’s health | Feasibility and acceptability | None |
Huskamp, 2018 [10] | Retrospective | Tele–substance use disorder/telemedicine | Substance use disorder | Telehealth use | None |
Mehrotra, 2017 [11] | Retrospective | Telemental/telemedicine | Mental health | Telehealth use | None |
Sinha, 2019 [12] | Qualitative | Telemedicine | Orthopedics | Patient satisfaction | Low |
Brecthel, 2018 [13] | Retrospective | Telestroke Network | Acute ischemic stroke | Diagnostic validation | Low |
Kapinos, 2019 [14] | Post hoc analysis | Telelactation | Reproductive care/women’s health | Design and demand | None |
Talbot, 2019 [15] | Retrospective | Telehealth | Mental health | Prevalence, diagnosis, and type of service | Low |
Lewiecki, 2017 [16] | Prospective | TeleECHO | Osteoporosis | Acceptability and self-confidence | Medium |
Moeckli, 2017 [17] | Mixed methods | Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO)/telemedicine |
HIV | Application and acceptability | Low |
Gilbertson-White, 2019 [18] | Mixed methods | Oncology Associated Symptoms and Individualized Strategies (OASIS) | Cancer | Patient needs and satisfaction | Low |
Liu, 2019 [19] | Qualitative | Teleophthalmology | Ophthalmology | Feasibility and acceptability | None |
Demirci, 2018 [20] | Qualitative | Telelactation/telemedicine | Reproductive care/women’s health | Feasibility and acceptability | Low |